Evaluation and program planning | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2793 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Evaluation and program planning

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Eval Program Plann
Abbreviated Name eval program plann
ISSN 1873-7870
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/evaluation-and-program-planning
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2019
Primary healthcare planning, bottleneck analysis and performance improvement: An evaluation of processes and outcomes in a Nigerian context.
Eboreime, Ejemai Amaize;Idika, Obinna;Omitiran, Kasarachi;Eboreime, Oghenekome;Ibisomi, Latifat;
Vol. 77 , pp. 101712
413 views DOI Abstract
2016
Evaluation of world's largest social welfare scheme: An assessment using non-parametric approach.
Singh, Sanjeet;
Vol. 57 , pp. 16-29
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using database linkages to measure innovation, commercialization, and survival of small businesses.
Onken, James;Miklos, Andrew C;Dorsey, Travis F;Aragon, Richard;Calcagno, Anna Maria;
Vol. 77 , pp. 101710
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
A longitudinal qualitative evaluation of an economic and social empowerment intervention to reduce girls’ vulnerability to HIV in rural Mozambique
Burke, H.
Vol. 77 , pp. 0-0
360 views DOI
2019
A hybrid mathematical programming model for optimal project portfolio selection using fuzzy inference system and analytic hierarchy process.
Tavana, Madjid;Khosrojerdi, Ghasem;Mina, Hassan;Rahman, Amirah;
Vol. 77 , pp. 101703
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Willing but unable? Extending theory to investigate community capacity to participate in Ghana's community-based health planning and service implementation.
Atinga, Roger A;Agyepong, Irene Akua;Esena, Reuben K;
Vol. 72 , pp. 170-178
356 views DOI Abstract
2018
Measuring unintended effects in peacebuilding: What the field of international cooperation can learn from innovative approaches shaped by complex contexts.
Lemon, Adrienne;Pinet, Mélanie;
Vol. 68 , pp. 253-261
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing emotional and social health using photographs: An innovative research method for rural studies and its applicability in a care-farming program for youth.
Norwood, Michael Francis;Lakhani, Ali;Maujean, Annick;Downes, Martin;Fullagar, Simone;McIntyre, Michelle;Byrne, Jason;Stewart, Anna;Barber, Bonnie L;Kendall, Elizabeth;
Vol. 77 , pp. 101707
344 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of a teen resident camp leadership program on changes in dimensions of self-control and interpersonal functioning, and their theory-based relationships
Annesi, J.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
330 views DOI
2019
Community-based participatory action research on rheumatic heart disease in an Australian Aboriginal homeland: Evaluation of the ‘On track watch’ project
Haynes, E.
Vol. 74 , pp. 38-53
326 views DOI
View All 31 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.