Indexed in Journament

Evaluation and program planning

ISSN 1873-7870· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,469 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
31 Articles
Scores higher than 37% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nom Abrégé Eval Program Plann
Nom Abrégé eval program plann
ISSN 1873-7870
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/evaluation-and-program-planning

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 11.1 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 12.1 11.5
Content Distribution 71.7 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2019
Primary healthcare planning, bottleneck analysis and performance improvement: An evaluation of processes and outcomes in a Nigerian context.
Eboreime, Ejemai Amaize;Idika, Obinna;Omitiran, Kasarachi;Eboreime, Oghenekome;Ibisomi, Latifat;
Vol. 77 , pp. 101712
452 views DOI Abstract
2016
Evaluation of world's largest social welfare scheme: An assessment using non-parametric approach.
Singh, Sanjeet;
Vol. 57 , pp. 16-29
451 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using database linkages to measure innovation, commercialization, and survival of small businesses.
Onken, James;Miklos, Andrew C;Dorsey, Travis F;Aragon, Richard;Calcagno, Anna Maria;
Vol. 77 , pp. 101710
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Willing but unable? Extending theory to investigate community capacity to participate in Ghana's community-based health planning and service implementation.
Atinga, Roger A;Agyepong, Irene Akua;Esena, Reuben K;
Vol. 72 , pp. 170-178
392 views DOI Abstract
2018
Measuring unintended effects in peacebuilding: What the field of international cooperation can learn from innovative approaches shaped by complex contexts.
Lemon, Adrienne;Pinet, Mélanie;
Vol. 68 , pp. 253-261
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
A longitudinal qualitative evaluation of an economic and social empowerment intervention to reduce girls’ vulnerability to HIV in rural Mozambique
Burke, H.
Vol. 77 , pp. 0-0
389 views DOI
2019
A hybrid mathematical programming model for optimal project portfolio selection using fuzzy inference system and analytic hierarchy process.
Tavana, Madjid;Khosrojerdi, Ghasem;Mina, Hassan;Rahman, Amirah;
Vol. 77 , pp. 101703
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing emotional and social health using photographs: An innovative research method for rural studies and its applicability in a care-farming program for youth.
Norwood, Michael Francis;Lakhani, Ali;Maujean, Annick;Downes, Martin;Fullagar, Simone;McIntyre, Michelle;Byrne, Jason;Stewart, Anna;Barber, Bonnie L;Kendall, Elizabeth;
Vol. 77 , pp. 101707
386 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of a teen resident camp leadership program on changes in dimensions of self-control and interpersonal functioning, and their theory-based relationships
Annesi, J.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
360 views DOI
2019
Community-based participatory action research on rheumatic heart disease in an Australian Aboriginal homeland: Evaluation of the ‘On track watch’ project
Haynes, E.
Vol. 74 , pp. 38-53
356 views DOI
2022
Healthy Summer Learners: An explanatory mixed methods study and process evaluation.
von Klinggraeff, Lauren;Dugger, Roddrick;Brazendale, Keith;Hunt, Ethan T;Moore, Justin B;Turner-McGrievy, Gabrielle;Vogler, Kenneth;Beets, Michael W;Armstrong, Bridget;Weaver, R Glenn;
Vol. 92 , pp. 102070
116 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluating innovation development among Brazilian micro and small businesses in view of management level: Insights from the local innovation agents program
Roth, Cardoso H.H.
Vol. 80 , pp. 0-0
147 views DOI
2020
What are the characteristics of the champion that influence the implementation of quality improvement programs?
Demes, Joseph Adrien Emmanuel;Nickerson, Nathan;Farand, Lambert;Montekio, Victor Becerril;Torres, Pilar;Dube, Jean Geto;Coq, Jean Gracia;Pomey, Marie-Pascale;Champagne, François;Jasmin, Ernst Robert;
Vol. 80 , pp. 101795
341 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pedagogical considerations for the teaching of evaluation
LaVelle, J.M.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
63 views DOI
2020
Participatory analytic hierarchy process for resource allocation in agricultural development projects.
De Marinis, Pietro;Sali, Guido;
Vol. 80 , pp. 101793
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation capacity building in the nonformal education context: Challenges and strategies
Kumar, Chaudhary A.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
204 views DOI
2020
Evaluating complex interventions in real context: Logic analysis of a case management program for frequent users of healthcare services
Hudon, C.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
223 views DOI
2020
Effects of a teen resident camp leadership program on changes in dimensions of self-control and interpersonal functioning, and their theory-based relationships
Annesi, J.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
360 views DOI
2020
Youth leadership programming in high-poverty minority students
Murphy, N.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
181 views DOI
2019
Evaluation capacity building in the nonformal education context: Challenges and strategies.
Kumar Chaudhary, Anil;Diaz, John;Jayaratne, K S U;Assan, Elsie;
Vol. 79 , pp. 101768
311 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,469 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.