Indexed in Journament

journal of nursing management

ISSN 1365-2834· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,926 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
74 Articles
Scores higher than 49% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j nurs manag
Abbreviated Name j nurs manag
ISSN 1365-2834
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652834

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 31.5 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 4.3 7.8
Content Distribution 66.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (74)

2019
A longitudinal assessment of occupational stress in Emergency Department Nursing Staff.
Basu, Subhashis;Harris, Angela;Mason, Sue;Norman, Joseph;
472 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nurses' negative affective states, moral disengagement, and knowledge hiding: The moderating role of ethical leadership.
Zhao, Hongdan;Xia, Qing;
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 357-370
458 views DOI Abstract
2000
Value of admission interviews in selecting of undergraduate nursing students.
Ehrenfeld, M;Tabak, N;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 101-6
455 views Abstract
2019
Relationship between authentic leadership and nurses' intent to leave: The mediating role of work environment and burnout.
Lee, Huan-Fang;Chiang, Hui-Ying;Kuo, Hui-Ting;
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 52-65
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Re-Examination of the Individual Differences That Explain Occupational Resilience and Psychological Adjustment Among Nurses.
Heritage, Brody;Rees, Clare S;Osseiran-Moisson, Rebecca;Chamberlain, Diane;Cusack, Lynette;Anderson, Judith;Fagence, Anna;Sutton, Katie;Brown, Janie;Terry, Victoria R;Hemsworth, David;Hegney, Desley G;
450 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Ethical Leadership Scale (ELS): Italian adaptation and exploration of the nomological network in a healthcare setting.
Zappalà, Salvatore;Toscano, Ferdinando;
446 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors affecting job satisfaction in long-term care unit managers, directors of care and facility administrators: A secondary analysis.
Aloisio, Laura D;Baumbusch, Jennifer;Estabrooks, Carole A;Bostrom, Anne-Marie;Chamberlain, Stephanie;Cummings, Greta G;Thompson, Genevieve;Squires, Janet E;
Vol. 20 , pp. 1611-1616.e4
446 views DOI Abstract
2019
Balancing the scales - Nurses' attempts at meeting family and employer needs in a work intensified environment.
Harvey, Clare;Baldwin, Adele;Thompson, Shona;Meyer, Alannah;Pearson, Maria;Otis, Edmond;
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors influencing work engagement among psychiatric nurses in Japan.
Mukaihata, Tsuyoshi;Fujimoto, Hirokazu;Greiner, Chieko;
433 views DOI Abstract
2002
The development of a time-based nursing information system in dermatology outpatients and day therapy areas.
Lynn, Shirley E;
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 153-60
426 views Abstract
2020
Factors Associated with Nurses' Willingness to Participate in Care of Patients with COVID-19: a Survey in China
Bainv W;Yun Z;Dejing X;Xiaoxu Z;Yan W;Niu N;Maomao Z;Ping Z;Aifeng M;;
, pp. -
89 views Abstract
2020
A cross-sectional observational study of missed nursing care in hospitals in China
Du H;Yang Y;Wang X;Zang Y;;
, pp. -
142 views Abstract
2020
Transformational Leadership, Knowledge Sharing and Reflection, and Work Teams' Performance: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis.
Anselmann, Veronika;Mulder, Regina H;
291 views DOI Abstract
2020
Factors associated with workplace fatigue among midwives in southern China: A multi-centre cross-sectional study.
Chen, Xiao-Qian;Jiang, Xiu-Min;Zheng, Qing-Xiang;Zheng, Jing;He, Hong-Gu;Pan, Yu-Qing;Liu, Gui-Hua;
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impact of intelligent healthscape quality on nurse job outcomes and job satisfaction: A test of the moderating effect of innovativeness.
Han, Jieun;Kang, Hyo-Jin;Kwon, Gyu Hyun;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 43-53
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
The mediating role of thriving: Mindfulness and contextual performance among Turkish nurses.
Şahin, Safiye;Arıcı Özcan, Neslihan;Arslan Babal, Reyhan;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 175-184
271 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Ethical Leadership Scale (ELS): Italian adaptation and exploration of the nomological network in a healthcare setting.
Zappalà, Salvatore;Toscano, Ferdinando;
446 views DOI Abstract
2020
A longitudinal assessment of occupational stress in Emergency Department Nursing Staff.
Basu, Subhashis;Harris, Angela;Mason, Sue;Norman, Joseph;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 167-174
282 views DOI Abstract
2020
A university-healthcare institution mentorship program: Improving transition to practice for students.
Lavoie-Tremblay, Mélanie;Sanzone, Lia;Aubé, Thalia;Bigras, Catherine;Cyr, Guylaine;Primeau, Gilbert;
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
A cross-lagged analysis of the relationships among workgroup commitment, motivation and proactive work behaviour in nurses.
Galletta, Maura;Vandenberghe, Christian;Portoghese, Igor;Allegrini, Elisabetta;Saiani, Luisa;Battistelli, Adalgisa;
Vol. 27 , No. 6 , pp. 1148-1158
304 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,926 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

31.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.