Indexed in Journament

american journal of pharmaceutical education

ISSN 1553-6467· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,835 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 56.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name am j pharm educ
Abbreviated Name am j pharm educ
ISSN 1553-6467
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/american-journal-of-pharmaceutical-education

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for american journal of pharmaceutical education
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 27.2 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 82.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2019
Consideration of Aggressive and Strategic Approaches to Address Declining Enrollment in US Pharmacy Schools.
Vol. 83 , No. 6 , pp. 6959
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a Postgraduate Community Pharmacist Specialization Program Using CanMEDS Competencies, and Entrustable Professional Activities.
Vol. 83 , No. 6 , pp. 6863
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmacy Students' Utilization of an Online Tool for Immediate Formative Feedback on Reflective Writing Tasks.
Vol. 83 , No. 6 , pp. 6800
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Roles of Empathy, Attachment Style, and Burnout in Pharmacy Students' Academic Satisfaction.
Vol. 83 , No. 5 , pp. 6706
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of Practice Management Entrustable Professional Activities by Pharmacists in North Dakota.
Vol. 83 , No. 10 , pp. 7486
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predicting Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment Performance Using Admissions, Curricular, Demographics, and Preparation Data.
Vol. 83 , No. 10 , pp. 7526
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmacy Education Needs to Address Diagnostic Safety.
Vol. 83 , No. 6 , pp. 7442
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Spirituality and Religiosity of Pharmacy Students.
Vol. 83 , No. 1 , pp. 6795
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Live Attendance and Video Capture Viewing on Student Examination Performance.
Vol. 83 , No. 6 , pp. 6897
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Laboratory Session to Prepare Pharmacy Students to Manage the Opioid Crisis Situation.
Vol. 83 , No. 7 , pp. 6988
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Addressing Unmet Patient Care Needs Through Curricular Development of Student Pharmacist Leadership and Entrepreneurial Skills.
Vol. 83 , No. 5 , pp. 6764
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predicting Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment Performance Using Admissions, Curricular, Demographics, and Preparation Data.
Vol. 83 , No. 10 , pp. 7526
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of Practice Management Entrustable Professional Activities by Pharmacists in North Dakota.
Vol. 83 , No. 10 , pp. 7486
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Enhancing Educational and Leadership Opportunities for Second-Year Pharmacy Residents.
Vol. 83 , No. 10 , pp. 7099
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the Co-Curriculum by Mapping Student Organization Involvement to Curricular Outcomes Using Mixed Methods.
Vol. 83 , No. 10 , pp. 7354
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Report of the 2018-2019 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.
Vol. 83 , No. 10 , pp. 7595
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Report of the 2018-2019 Student Affairs Standing Committee.
Vol. 83 , No. 10 , pp. 7656
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Leading Change in Academic Pharmacy: Report of the 2018-2019 AACP Academic Affairs Committee.
Vol. 83 , No. 10 , pp. 7661
321 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,835 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

27.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

82.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.