Indexed in Journament

international journal of human resource management

ISSN 0958-5192· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #5,851 of 29,317 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 80% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of human resource management
Abbreviated Name international journal of human resource management
ISSN 0958-5192
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rijh20/current

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.1 30.1
Accessibility 35.0 18.5
Timeliness 50.0 22.4
Diversity 30.0 29.3
Innovation 40.0 32.1
Community Impact 31.0 15.2
Content Distribution 79.2 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2019
Chinese multinationals’ approach to international human resource management: a longitudinal study
Zhu, J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2166-2185
345 views DOI
2019
Employees are satisfied with their benefits, but so what? The consequences of benefit satisfaction on employees’ organizational commitment and turnover intentions
de, la Torre-Ruiz J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2097-2120
304 views DOI
2019
When workplace ostracism leads to burnout: the roles of job self-determination and future time orientation
Qian, J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2465-2481
298 views DOI
2015
Ethnic homophily perceptions as an emergent IHRM challenge: evidence from firms operating in Sri Lanka during the ethnic conflict
Lee, H.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1645-1664
282 views DOI
2019
Strategic human resource management and inertia in the corporate entrepreneurship of a multinational enterprise
Amberg, J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 759-793
280 views DOI
2019
Towards a configuration of socially responsible human resource management policies and practices: findings from an academic consensus
Barrena-Martínez, J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2544-2580
265 views DOI
2019
The human resources management contribution to social responsibility and environmental sustainability: explorations from Ibero-America
Alcaraz, J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 3166-3189
263 views DOI
2019
Internationalisation of Chinese banks and financial institutions and its implications for IHRM
Jack, R.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2121-2136
259 views DOI
2019
Internationalization of Chinese banking and financial institutions: a fuzzy-set analysis of the leader-TMT dynamics
Su, Y.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2137-2165
254 views DOI
2019
To integrate or not to integrate: HRM practice of Chinese banks in Canada
Yang, Y.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2186-2210
253 views DOI
2020
Employee–organization exchange and employee creativity: a motivational perspective
Pan, W.
Vol. 31 , pp. 385-407
133 views DOI
2020
High-performance work systems and key employee attitudes: the roles of psychological capital and an interactional justice climate
Miao, R.
, pp. 0-0
214 views DOI
2019
Facilitating meaningfulness in the workplace: a field intervention study
Fletcher, L.
, pp. 0-0
132 views DOI
2019
Stuck in the middle? Human resource management at the interface of academia and industry
Gao, J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 3081-3112
194 views DOI
2019
The human resources management contribution to social responsibility and environmental sustainability: explorations from Ibero-America
Alcaraz, J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 3166-3189
263 views DOI
2019
Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behaviour: How much balance do we need?
Caniëls, M.
Vol. 30 , pp. 565-585
153 views DOI
2019
Mapping the relationships between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: a study of the banking industry in China
Cooke, F.
Vol. 30 , pp. 1239-1260
133 views DOI
2019
When workplace ostracism leads to burnout: the roles of job self-determination and future time orientation
Qian, J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2465-2481
298 views DOI
2019
Impact of knowledge oriented leadership on knowledge management behaviour through employee work attitudes
Shamim, S.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2387-2417
177 views DOI
2019
Employees are satisfied with their benefits, but so what? The consequences of benefit satisfaction on employees’ organizational commitment and turnover intentions
de, la Torre-Ruiz J.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2097-2120
304 views DOI
Journament Score
41.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #5,851 of 29,317 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.