integrative and comparative biology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4518 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
90
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

integrative and comparative biology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name integr comp biol
Abbreviated Name integrative and comparative biology
ISSN 1557-7023
Aim and Scope
URL http://icb.oxfordjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (59 total)

2019
Individual Cryptic Scaling Relationships and the Evolution of Animal Form.
Frankino, W Anthony;Bakota, Eric;Dworkin, Ian;Wilkinson, Gerald S;Wolf, Jason B;Shingleton, Alexander W;
477 views DOI Abstract
2019
Beyond the Powerhouse: Integrating Mitonuclear Evolution, Physiology, and Theory in Comparative Biology.
Havird, Justin C;Weaver, Ryan J;Milani, Liliana;Ghiselli, Fabrizio;Greenway, Ryan;Ramsey, Adam J;Jimenez, Ana G;Dowling, Damian K;Hood, Wendy R;Montooth, Kristi L;Estes, Suzanne;Schulte, Patricia M;Sokolova, Inna M;Hill, Geoffrey E;
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Awards, Scholarships, and Grants Awarded at the SICB Meeting in January 2019
not, found
Vol. 59 , pp. 1-2
338 views DOI
2019
The Pronephros; a Fresh Perspective.
de Bakker, B S;van den Hoff, M J B;Vize, P D;Oostra, R J;
Vol. 59 , No. 1 , pp. 29-47
321 views DOI Abstract
2018
Communication through Playful Systems: Presenting Scientific Worlds the Way a Game Might Do.
Kipnis, Anna;
Vol. 58 , No. 6 , pp. 1235-1246
250 views DOI Abstract
2025
Increased temperature and CO2 induce plasticity and impose novel selection on plant traits.
Denney, Derek A; Anderson, Jill T
49 views DOI Abstract
2004
Temperature, Growth Rate, and Body Size in Ectotherms: Fitting Pieces of a Life-History Puzzle
Michael J. Angilletta
24 views DOI Abstract
2003
Complex Population Dynamics: A Theoretical/Empirical Synthesis
Marcel Holyoak
23 views DOI
2006
Recent progress in understanding larval dispersal: new directions and digressions
Lisa A. Levin
22 views DOI Abstract
2006
Are mountain passes higher in the tropics? janzen's hypothesis revisited
Cameron K. Ghalambor
18 views DOI Abstract
View All 59 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
90
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.