Urban Invasion Restructures Locomotor Repertoires: Evidence from Introduced Monk Parakeets ( Myiopsitta monachus )

Clicks: 12
ID: 332200
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #113 of 124 articles by views in integrative and comparative biology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 124 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Biological invasions are rarely examined through a locomotor lens, yet they provide a powerful opportunity to understand how organisms adjust movement in response to novel environmental conditions. When locomotion is considered in invasion biology, it is typically evaluated in terms of performance (e.g., speed, endurance, dispersal capacity), with far less attention given to how organisms restructure the behaviors that comprise locomotion itself. Urban environments introduce novel substrate geometries and mechanical challenges, potentially altering not only how animals move, but which behaviors they use. Using previously collected positional behavior data from an introduced population of monk parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus), this study evaluates how locomotor repertoire structure varies across substrate types, with particular emphasis on artificial substrates. Locomotor behavior was quantified as substrate-specific probability distributions and analyzed using complementary metrics of diversity, evenness, behavioral enrichment, and repertoire dissimilarity. Artificial substrates exhibited the highest locomotor diversity and high evenness, indicating a broad and relatively balanced use of locomotor behaviors. In contrast, natural substrates were characterized by lower diversity and greater dominance of specific behaviors. Behavioral enrichment analyses revealed increased use of walking and multiple climbing strategies on artificial substrates, coupled with reductions in aerial transitions (i.e, Flight_short_interbranch) and sidling. Dissimilarity metrics further demonstrated that locomotor repertoires on artificial substrates were qualitatively distinct from those observed in natural contexts. These findings indicate that urban environments drive restructuring of locomotor repertoires rather than simple performance tuning within a fixed behavioral framework. By demonstrating that locomotor behavior itself can shift in response to environmental novelty, this study highlights the importance of integrating behavioral, performance, and morphological perspectives when evaluating adaptation to urban environments and biological invasion.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221650062 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Michael Constantine Granatosky
Journal integrative and comparative biology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/icb/icag115
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icag115
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.