Indexed in Journament

Injury

ISSN 1879-0267· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,888 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 45.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Injury
Abbreviated Name injury
ISSN 1879-0267
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/injury

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.9 7.8
Content Distribution 68.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2007
Five-year functional outcome analysis of ankle fracture fixation
Shah NH;Sundaram RO;Velusamy A;Braithwaite IJ;;
Vol. 38 , No. 11 , pp. -
472 views Abstract
2020
Is intramedullary screw fixation biomechanically superior to locking plate fixation and/or tension band wiring in transverse olecranon fractures? A cadaveric biomechanical comparison study.
Hahn, Alexander;O'Hara, Nathan N;Koh, Kyung;Zhang, Li-Qun;O'Toole, Robert V;Andrew Eglseder, W;
415 views DOI Abstract
2007
The management of ankle fractures in the elderly
Strauss EJ;Egol KA;;
Vol. 38 Suppl 3 , pp. -
409 views Abstract
2019
Correlating injury severity scores and major trauma volume using a state-wide in-patient administrative dataset linked to trauma registry data-A retrospective analysis from New South Wales Australia.
Dinh, Michael M;Singh, Hardeep;Sarrami, Pooria;Levesque, Jean-Frederic;
408 views DOI Abstract
2020
Over view of major traumatic injury in Australia--Implications for trauma system design.
Cameron, P A;Fitzgerald, M C;Curtis, K;McKie, E;Gabbe, B;Earnest, A;Christey, G;Clarke, C;Crozier, J;Dinh, M;Ellis, D Y;Howard, T;Joseph, A P;McDermott, K;Matthew, J;Ogilvie, R;Pollard, C;Rao, S;Reade, M;Rushworth, N;Zalstein, S;, ;
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 114-121
383 views DOI Abstract
2018
Utilization of injury care case studies: a systematic review of the World Health Organization's "Strengthening care for the injured: Success stories and lessons learned from around the world".
Tessler, Robert A;Stadeli, Kathryn M;Chadbunchachai, Witaya;Gyedu, Adam;Lagrone, Lacey;Reynolds, Teri;Rubiano, Andres;Mock, Charles N;
Vol. 49 , No. 11 , pp. 1969-1978
366 views DOI Abstract
2014
A prospective look at the burden of sharps injuries and splashes among trauma health care workers in developing countries: true picture or tip of iceberg.
Rajkumari, Nonika;Thanbuana, B T;John, Nibu Varghese;Gunjiyal, Jacinta;Mathur, Purva;Misra, Mahesh Chandra;
Vol. 45 , No. 9 , pp. 1470-8
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of the AO Foundation on fracture care: An evaluation of 60 years AO Foundation.
Joeris, Alexander;Höglinger, Marc;Meier, Flurina;Knöfler, Fabio;Scholz, Stefan;Brügger, Urs;Denk, Eberhard;Gutzwiller, Felix;Prein, Joachim;Renner, Nikolaus;Eichler, Klaus;
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of surgical procedures on soft tissue microcirculation in calcaneal fractures: A prospective longitudinal cohort study
Felix Bläsius,Björn-Christian Link,Frank J.P. Beeres,Lukas Daniel Iselin,Benjamin Moritz Leu,Boyko Gueorguiev,Kajetan Klos,Bergita Ganse,Sven Nebelung,Ali Modabber,Daphne Eschbach,C. Weber,Klemens Horst,Matthias Knobe;Felix Bläsius;Björn-Christian Link;Frank J.P. Beeres;Lukas Daniel Iselin;Benjamin Moritz Leu;Boyko Gueorguiev;Kajetan Klos;Bergita Ganse;Sven Nebelung;Ali Modabber;Daphne Eschbach;C. Weber;Klemens Horst;Matthias Knobe;
Vol. 50 , No. 12 , pp. 2332-2338
349 views DOI
2016
The hazards of off-road motor sports: Are four wheels better than two?
Villegas, Cassandra V;Bowman, Stephen M;Zogg, Cheryl K;Scott, Valerie K;Haut, Elliott R;Stevens, Kent A;Efron, David T;Haider, Adil H;
Vol. 47 , No. 1 , pp. 178-83
303 views DOI Abstract
2023
A new classification for quadrilateral plate fracture of acetabulum
25 views DOI Abstract
2022
A comparative study of hip fracture care and outcomes in major trauma centres versus trauma units.
Tyas, Ben;Lukic, John;Harrison, John;Singisetti, Kiran;
206 views DOI Abstract
2020
Can locking plate fixation of symphyseal disruptions allow early weight bearing?
Kankanalu, Pradeep;Orfanos, Georgios;Dwyer, Jonathan;Lim, Justin;Youssef, Bishoy;
111 views DOI Abstract
2020
Novel techniques demonstrate superior fixation of simple transverse patella fractures - A biomechanical study.
Lenihan, Jonathan;Ramos-Pascual, Sonia;Silvestros, Pavlos;Beak, Philip;Miles, Anthony W;Trompeter, Alex;
Vol. 51 , No. 6 , pp. 1288-1293
270 views DOI Abstract
2020
Post-operative outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation versus circular external fixation in treatment of tibial plafond fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Malik-Tabassum, Khalid;Pillai, Kavya;Hussain, Yusuf;Bleibleh, Sabri;Babu, Satish;Giannoudis, Peter V;Tosounidis, Theodoros H;
Vol. 51 , No. 7 , pp. 1448-1456
185 views DOI Abstract
2020
Flexible nails have a significantly increased risk of complications compared with plating techniques when treating diaphyseal femoral fractures in children aged 5-12: A systematic review.
Donovan, Richard L;Harries, Luke;Whitehouse, Michael R;
240 views DOI Abstract
2020
Outcome of revision surgery for bisphosphonate related subtrochanteric fracture non-union following failed intramedullary nailing.
Nagy, Mathias T;Pydisetty, Gaurav;Kwaees, Tariq A;Saldanha, Kiran;
288 views DOI Abstract
2020
Is intramedullary screw fixation biomechanically superior to locking plate fixation and/or tension band wiring in transverse olecranon fractures? A cadaveric biomechanical comparison study.
Hahn, Alexander;O'Hara, Nathan N;Koh, Kyung;Zhang, Li-Qun;O'Toole, Robert V;Andrew Eglseder, W;
415 views DOI Abstract
2020
Over view of major traumatic injury in Australia--Implications for trauma system design.
Cameron, P A;Fitzgerald, M C;Curtis, K;McKie, E;Gabbe, B;Earnest, A;Christey, G;Clarke, C;Crozier, J;Dinh, M;Ellis, D Y;Howard, T;Joseph, A P;McDermott, K;Matthew, J;Ogilvie, R;Pollard, C;Rao, S;Reade, M;Rushworth, N;Zalstein, S;, ;
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 114-121
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of surgical procedures on soft tissue microcirculation in calcaneal fractures: A prospective longitudinal cohort study
Felix Bläsius,Björn-Christian Link,Frank J.P. Beeres,Lukas Daniel Iselin,Benjamin Moritz Leu,Boyko Gueorguiev,Kajetan Klos,Bergita Ganse,Sven Nebelung,Ali Modabber,Daphne Eschbach,C. Weber,Klemens Horst,Matthias Knobe;Felix Bläsius;Björn-Christian Link;Frank J.P. Beeres;Lukas Daniel Iselin;Benjamin Moritz Leu;Boyko Gueorguiev;Kajetan Klos;Bergita Ganse;Sven Nebelung;Ali Modabber;Daphne Eschbach;C. Weber;Klemens Horst;Matthias Knobe;
Vol. 50 , No. 12 , pp. 2332-2338
349 views DOI
Journament Score
32.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,888 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.