progress in oceanography | Journament

Journal Ranking

#550 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

progress in oceanography

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name progress in oceanography
Abbreviated Name progress in oceanography
ISSN 0079-6611
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/progress-in-oceanography
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2018
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) larval dispersal in the Iberian upwelling system, using coupled biophysical techniques
Santos A.
Vol. 162 , pp. 83-97
317 views DOI
2018
A trophic index for sardine (Sardina pilchardus) and its relationship to population abundance in the southern Bay of Biscay and adjacent waters of the NE Atlantic
Bode A.
Vol. 166 , pp. 139-147
300 views DOI
2019
Corrigendum to Coccolithophore growth and calcification in a changing ocean’ [Progress in Oceanography (2017) 276–295](S0079661117302148)(10.1016/j.pocean.2017.10.007)
Krumhardt, K.
Vol. 171 , pp. 251
255 views DOI
2015
klasifikasi data trafik internet menggunakan metode bayes network (studi kasus jaringan internet universitas semarang)
;Rastri Prathivi
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 42-45
252 views DOI Abstract
2009
kerahasiaan dan keutuhan keamanan data dalam menjaga integritas dan keberadaan informasi data
;M Mufadhol
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 78-87
238 views DOI Abstract
2015
sistem informasi secara online tugas akhir mahasiswa jurusan teknologi informasi fakultas teknologi informasi dan komunikasi
;Atmoko Nugroho;Nur Wakhidah;Bernadus Very Christioko
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 13-19
219 views DOI Abstract
2015
pemanfaatan web services instagram sebagai media kompetisi publikasi pada website xlawards2014
;Mohammad Sani Suprayogi
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 34-36
197 views DOI Abstract
2011
perbaikan kualitas citra menggunakan metode contrast stretching
;Nur Wakhidah
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 78-83
193 views DOI Abstract
2016
perbandingan support vector machine dan k-nearest neighbor untuk klasifikasi telur fertil dan infertil berdasarkan analisis texture glcm
;Dewi Nurdiyah;Indra Abdam Muwakhid
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 29-34
190 views DOI Abstract
2007
sistem komunikasi seluler dengan universal mobile telephone system ( umts )
;Titin Winarti
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 50-59
186 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.