south african journal of economic and management sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8535 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

south african journal of economic and management sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name south african journal of economic and management sciences
Abbreviated Name south african journal of economic and management sciences
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2001
An analysis of affirmative action in a South African public sector department
Brand, H. E.;Stoltz, S.;
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 118-132
503 views Abstract
2002
Tax revenue as an automatic fiscal stabiliser: A South African perspective
Swanepoel, A. S.;Schoeman, N. J.;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 566-588
332 views Abstract
2000
Atmospherics and the establishment of long-term customer relationships in a retail environment
Olivier, I.;Fletcher, M.;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 334-343
296 views Abstract
2014
Meeting the challenge of the work-life balance in the South African workplace
Mageni, GF;Slabbert, AD;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 393-401
287 views Abstract
2007
Experiential learning and critical reflection as a tool for transfer of business knowledge: An empirical case study of a start-up simulation intervention for nascent entrepreneurs
Roux, I.
Vol. 10 , pp. 330-347
284 views
2018
Ethical practices of small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries: Literature analysis
Turyakira, Peter K.;
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e7
279 views Abstract
2014
External debt and capital flight in Nigeria: Is there a revolving door?
Ajilore, OT;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 211-224
272 views Abstract
1998
The 1994 ICPD in Cairo: Draconian measures vs. the empowerment of women
Horner, Jim;Taylor, Wagiha;
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 219-233
266 views Abstract
2013
A marketing perspective on the impact of financial and non-financial measures on shareholder value
Gerber, Charlene;Erasmus, Pierre D;Terblanche, Nic S;Schmidt, Delia;
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 216-230
123 views Abstract
2024
Evaluating shareholder wealth creation in JSE-listed investment holding companies
Schwenke, N.
Vol. 27 , pp. 0-0
77 views DOI
View All 11 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.