research in social & administrative pharmacy : rsap | Journament

Journal Ranking

#500 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

research in social & administrative pharmacy : rsap

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name res social adm pharm
Abbreviated Name res social adm pharm
ISSN 1934-8150
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-social-and-administrative-pharmacy
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2010
Influence of ownership type on role orientation, role affinity, and role conflict among community pharmacy managers and owners in Canada.
Perepelkin, Jason;Dobson, Roy Thomas;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 280-92
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of the EFQM excellence model to improve hospital pharmacy performance.
Rodríguez-González, Carmen Guadalupe;Sarobe-González, Camino;Durán-García, María Esther;Mur-Mur, Ana;Sánchez-Fresneda, María Norberta;Pañero-Taberna, María de Las Mercedes;Pla-Mestre, Rosa;Herranz-Alonso, Ana;Sanjurjo-Sáez, María;
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Community pharmacists' attitudes, barriers, knowledge and counseling practice with regard to preconception, pregnancy and lactation.
Ceulemans, Michael;Liekens, Sophie;Van Calsteren, Kristel;Allegaert, Karel;Foulon, Veerle;
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
Qualitative formative implementation research to inform introduction of a new essential medicine.
Oliver, Victoria L;Tolera, Moti;Teklu, Alula M;Minaye, Abebaw;Lambert, Pete;McIntosh, Michelle P;
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examining factors associated with adherence to hormonal therapy in breast cancer patients.
Shah, Chintal H;Balkrishnan, Rajesh;Diaby, Vakaramoko;Xiao, Hong;
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reports of gabapentin and pregabalin abuse, misuse, dependence, or overdose: An analysis of the Food And Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS).
Evoy, Kirk E;Covvey, Jordan R;Peckham, Alyssa M;Ochs, Leslie;Hultgren, Kyle E;
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. 953-958
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medication review service implementation in community pharmacy settings: Scoping review with focus on implementation studies.
Brandt, Jaden;Lê, Mê-Linh;Jantscher, Sonja;Bricelj, Aleša;Louizos, Christopher;Ng, Sheila;Sibley, Kathryn;
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Media's effect on shaping knowledge, awareness risk perceptions and communication practices of pandemic COVID-19 among pharmacists.
Karasneh, Reema;Al-Azzam, Sayer;Muflih, Suhaib;Soudah, Ola;Hawamdeh, Sahar;Khader, Yousef;
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing barriers and increasing use of immunization information systems in independent community pharmacies: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Hastings, Tessa J;Ha, David;Fox, Brent I;Qian, Jingjing;Lakin, Joni;Westrick, Salisa C;
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ophthalmic drug abuse: An observational study from community pharmacies.
Al-Khalaileh, Waed;Abu-Farha, Rana;Wazaify, Mayyada;Van Hout, Marie Claire;
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. 943-948
332 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
44
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.