Indexed in Journament

surgical endoscopy

ISSN 1432-2218· EN

Journal Website
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.1/100
Journament Score
#854
Journament Rank
16
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name surg endosc
Abbreviated Name surg endosc
ISSN 1432-2218
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/464

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Song KB;Kwon J;Lee YJ;Hwang DW;Lee JH;Shin SH;Kim MH;Lee SK;Seo DW;Lee SS;Park DH;Song TJ;Park G;Park Y;Lee SJ;Kim SC;;
Vol. 33 , No. 10 , pp. -
397 views Abstract
2019
Fluorescence-enabled assessment of adrenal gland localization and perfusion in posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenal surgery in a preclinical model.
Seeliger, Barbara;Walz, Martin K;Alesina, Pier F;Agnus, Vincent;Pop, Raoul;Barberio, Manuel;Saadi, Alend;Worreth, Marc;Marescaux, Jacques;Diana, Michele;
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
SurgAI: deep learning for computerized laparoscopic image understanding in gynaecology.
Madad Zadeh, Sabrina;Francois, Tom;Calvet, Lilian;Chauvet, Pauline;Canis, Michel;Bartoli, Adrien;Bourdel, Nicolas;
349 views DOI Abstract
2015
The Business Engineering Surgical Technologies (BEST) teaching method: incubating talents for surgical innovation.
de Ruijter, V;Halvax, P;Dallemagne, B;Swanström, L;Marescaux, J;Perretta, S;
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 48-54
341 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sodium phosphate is superior to polyethylene glycol in constipated patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dang, Jerry T;Moolla, Muhammad;Dang, ThucNhi Tran;Shaw, Ashley;Tian, Chunhong;Karmali, Shahzeer;Sultanian, Richard;
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of robotic assistance on mental workload and cognitive performance of surgical trainees performing a complex minimally invasive suturing task.
Lau, Esther;Alkhamesi, Nawar A;Schlachta, Christopher M;
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center
Lyman, W.
Vol. 33 , pp. 2991-3000
290 views DOI
2013
Correlation of the gastroesophageal flap valve grade with the surgery rate in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Kayaoglu, Huseyin Ayhan;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 801-7
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps.
Murakami, Takaaki;Yoshida, Naohisa;Yasuda, Ritsu;Hirose, Ryohei;Inoue, Ken;Dohi, Osamu;Kamada, Kazuhiro;Uchiyama, Kazuhiko;Konishi, Hideyuki;Naito, Yuji;Morinaga, Yukiko;Kishimoto, Mitsuo;Konishi, Eiichi;Ogiso, Kiyoshi;Inada, Yutaka;Itoh, Yoshito;
289 views DOI Abstract
2020
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic tumors: a single surgeon's experience of 228 consecutive cases
Hong S;Song KB;Madkhali AA;Hwang K;Yoo D;Lee JW;Youn WY;Alshammary S;Park Y;Lee W;Kwon J;Lee JH;Hwang DW;Kim SC;;
Vol. 34 , No. 6 , pp. -
262 views Abstract
2020
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center
Song KB;Kim SC;Lee W;Hwang DW;Lee JH;Kwon J;Park Y;Lee SJ;Park G;;
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. -
242 views Abstract
2020
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic tumors: a single surgeon's experience of 228 consecutive cases
Hong S;Song KB;Madkhali AA;Hwang K;Yoo D;Lee JW;Youn WY;Alshammary S;Park Y;Lee W;Kwon J;Lee JH;Hwang DW;Kim SC;;
Vol. 34 , No. 6 , pp. -
262 views Abstract
2020
No difference in genitourinary complications after laparoscopic vs. open groin hernia repair in women: a nationwide linked register-based cohort study
Schmidt, L.
Vol. 34 , pp. 1978-1984
215 views DOI
2020
Sodium phosphate is superior to polyethylene glycol in constipated patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dang, Jerry T;Moolla, Muhammad;Dang, ThucNhi Tran;Shaw, Ashley;Tian, Chunhong;Karmali, Shahzeer;Sultanian, Richard;
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
SurgAI: deep learning for computerized laparoscopic image understanding in gynaecology.
Madad Zadeh, Sabrina;Francois, Tom;Calvet, Lilian;Chauvet, Pauline;Canis, Michel;Bartoli, Adrien;Bourdel, Nicolas;
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Song KB;Kwon J;Lee YJ;Hwang DW;Lee JH;Shin SH;Kim MH;Lee SK;Seo DW;Lee SS;Park DH;Song TJ;Park G;Park Y;Lee SJ;Kim SC;;
Vol. 33 , No. 10 , pp. -
397 views Abstract
2019
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center
Lyman, W.
Vol. 33 , pp. 2991-3000
290 views DOI
2019
The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Song, K.
Vol. 33 , pp. 3314-3324
255 views DOI
2019
Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps.
Murakami, Takaaki;Yoshida, Naohisa;Yasuda, Ritsu;Hirose, Ryohei;Inoue, Ken;Dohi, Osamu;Kamada, Kazuhiro;Uchiyama, Kazuhiko;Konishi, Hideyuki;Naito, Yuji;Morinaga, Yukiko;Kishimoto, Mitsuo;Konishi, Eiichi;Ogiso, Kiyoshi;Inada, Yutaka;Itoh, Yoshito;
289 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of robotic assistance on mental workload and cognitive performance of surgical trainees performing a complex minimally invasive suturing task.
Lau, Esther;Alkhamesi, Nawar A;Schlachta, Christopher M;
296 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.