Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps.

Clicks: 312
ID: 37063
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #8 of 16 articles by views in surgical endoscopy

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Local recurrence after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) of colorectal polyps has not been well analyzed. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of local recurrence.We retrospectively reviewed consecutive lesions resected by CSP from 2014 to 2016 and lesions that were followed up at ≥ 10 months after CSP, were analyzed. Our indication for CSP was a benign tumor of < 15 mm in size. We analyzed local recurrence and its risk factors using multivariate analyses. In addition, we compared lesions of ≥ 10 mm and < 10 mm. Moreover, therapeutic methods for recurrence were analyzed.Finally, we analyzed 554 cases out of 820 consecutive cases. The mean polyp size was 5.3 ± 2.8 mm and the en bloc resection and histopathological complete resection rates were 99.3% and 70.2%, respectively. The overall recurrence rate was 1.9% (mean follow-up period: 13.0 ± 4.0 months). Significant differences were observed between 11 recurrent lesions and 543 lesions without recurrence regarding polyp size (8.0 ± 3.7 mm vs. 5.2 ± 2.7 mm, p < 0.001), rate of sessile-serrated polyp (27.3% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001), and histopathological positive margin (45.4% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.019). Multivariate analyses showed that a histopathological positive margin was the only significant risk factor for local recurrence (OR 16.600, 95% CI 3.707-74.331, p < 0.001). Regarding the comparison between 74 lesions of ≥ 10 mm and 480 lesions of < 10 mm, significant differences were observed in the en bloc resection rate (93.2% vs. 100%, p < 0.001), high-grade dysplasia rate (8.1% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001), and histopathological complete resection rate (54.0% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.001). The recurrence rates of these two groups were 5.4% and 1.4%, respectively (p = 0.069). All recurrent cases could be resected with repeat CSP.The local recurrence rate after CSP for lesions of < 10 mm was 1.4%. CSP was not recommended for lesions of ≥ 10 mm due to high rates of recurrence and malignancy.
Reference Key
murakami2019localsurgical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Murakami, Takaaki;Yoshida, Naohisa;Yasuda, Ritsu;Hirose, Ryohei;Inoue, Ken;Dohi, Osamu;Kamada, Kazuhiro;Uchiyama, Kazuhiko;Konishi, Hideyuki;Naito, Yuji;Morinaga, Yukiko;Kishimoto, Mitsuo;Konishi, Eiichi;Ogiso, Kiyoshi;Inada, Yutaka;Itoh, Yoshito;
Journal surgical endoscopy
Year 2019
DOI
10.1007/s00464-019-07072-7
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.