journal of aquatic food product technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1092 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
29
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of aquatic food product technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of aquatic food product technology
Abbreviated Name journal of aquatic food product technology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (149 total)

2014
the marine toxin, yessotoxin, induces apoptosis and increases mitochondrial activity
;Andrea Fernandez-Araujo;M. Mercedes Rodríguez Vieytes;Ana María Botana
Vol. 1 , pp. -
627 views DOI Abstract
2014
crambescidin 816 induces calcium influx though glutamate receptors in primary cultures of cortical neurons
;Víctor Martín Vázquez;Olivier Thomas;Mercedes Rodriguez Vieytes
Vol. 1 , pp. -
512 views DOI Abstract
2018
ecotoxicological effects of chemical contaminants adsorbed to microplastics in the clam scrobicularia plana
;Sarit O'Donovan;Nélia C. Mestre;Serena Abel;Tainá G. Fonseca;Camilla C. Carteny;Bettie Cormier;Bettie Cormier;Steffen H. Keiter;Maria J. Bebianno
Vol. 5 , pp. -
372 views DOI Abstract
2014
a qsar approach for virtual screening of lead-like molecules en route to antitumor and antibiotic drugs from marine and microbial natural products
;Florbela Pereira;Diogo A. R. S. Latino
Vol. 1 , pp. -
360 views DOI Abstract
2018
ultra-violet radiation has a limited impact on seasonal differences in the acropora muricata holobiont
;Jeroen A. J. M. van de Water;Lucile Courtial;Lucile Courtial;Lucile Courtial;Fanny Houlbrèque;Stéphan Jacquet;Christine Ferrier-Pagès
Vol. 5 , pp. -
343 views DOI Abstract
2017
systematic planning and ecosystem-based management as strategies to reconcile mangrove conservation with resource use
;Rebecca Borges;Rebecca Borges;Alexander C. Ferreira;Luiz D. Lacerda
Vol. 4 , pp. -
315 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessment of the deep sea wreck uss independence
;Lisa C. Symons;James P. Delgado;Kelly Elliot;Frank Cantelas;Robert Schwemmer
Vol. 3 , pp. -
308 views DOI Abstract
2017
calcium carbonate production, coral cover and diversity along a distance gradient from stone town: a case study from zanzibar, tanzania
;Natalia Herrán;Natalia Herrán;Gita R. Narayan;Claire E. Reymond;Hildegard Westphal;Hildegard Westphal
Vol. 4 , pp. -
306 views DOI Abstract
2014
characteristics, functions and applications of metallothionein in aquatic vertebrates
;Wei-Chao eWang;Huan eMao;Dan-Dan eMa;Wan-Xi eYang
Vol. 1 , pp. -
305 views DOI Abstract
2018
scientific considerations for the assessment and management of mine tailings disposal in the deep sea
;Lindsay L. Vare;Maria C. Baker;John A. Howe;Lisa A. Levin;Carlos Neira;Eva Z. Ramirez-Llodra;Amanda Reichelt-Brushett;Ashley A. Rowden;Tracy M. Shimmield;Stuart L. Simpson;Eulogio H. Soto
Vol. 5 , pp. -
304 views DOI Abstract
View All 149 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
29
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

29.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.