IMA fungus | Journament

Journal Ranking

#234 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
44.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 天前

IMA fungus

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
索引数
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
简称 IMA Fungus
缩写名称 ima fungus
ISSN 2210-6340
宗旨与范围
URL https://imafungus.biomedcentral.com
作者须知

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (5 total)

2016
Recommendations for competing sexual-asexually typified generic names in Sordariomycetes (except Diaporthales, Hypocreales, and Magnaporthales).
Réblová, Martina;Miller, Andrew N;Rossman, Amy Y;Seifert, Keith A;Crous, Pedro W;Hawksworth, David L;Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed A;Cannon, Paul F;Daranagama, Dinushani A;De Beer, Z Wilhelm;Huang, Shi-Ke;Hyde, Kevin D;Jayawardena, Ruvvishika;Jaklitsch, Walter;Jones, E B Gareth;Ju, Yu-Ming;Judith, Caroline;Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S N;Pang, Ka-Lai;Petrini, Liliane E;Raja, Huzefa A;Romero, Andrea I;Shearer, Carol;Senanayake, Indunil C;Voglmayr, Hermann;Weir, Bevan S;Wijayawarden, Nalin N;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 131-53
294 views DOI Abstract
2015
does the finding of small airway obstruction in pulmonary function tests effect end-expiratory carbonmonoxide level?
;Banu Musaffa Salepçi;Ali Fidan;Elif Torun Parmaksız;Esma Coşkun;Nesrin Kıral;Benan Çağlayan;Sevda Şener Cömert;Coşkun Doğan
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 154-158
273 views DOI Abstract
2018
features of endobronchial metastases from extrathoracic malignancy and positron emission tomography-computerized tomography findings
;Coskun Dogan;Seda Beyhan Sağmen;Elif Torun Parmaksız;Ali Fidan;Nesrin Kıral;Banu Salepçi;Sevda Şener Cömert
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 37-42
267 views DOI Abstract
2017
Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi - 20.
May, Tom W;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 189-203
257 views DOI Abstract
2020
Heterothallism and potential hybridization events inferred for twenty-two yellow morel species
Du, Xi-Hui;Wu, Dongmei;Kang, Heng;Wang, Hanchen;Xu, Nan;Li, Tingting;Chen, Keliang;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-19
239 views DOI Abstract
44
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

44.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.