Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi - 20.

Ratification of appointment of repositories by the International Mycological Congress is reported. The following two family names are recommended for conservation: against ; and the teleomorph-typified against the anamorph-typified . The following family name is not recommended for conservation: against . The following 10 generic names are recommended for conservation: the teleomorph-typified name against the conserved anamorph-typified name ; Sorokīn () against Roussel (); , nom. cons., against an additional name, ; (Fr. : Fr.) P. Kumm. () against (Webb ex Spach) Fourr. () with a conserved type; against ; with a conserved type; with a conserved type; with that spelling; with a conserved type; and against . Conservation of Freng. () against Sacc. () is not opposed. The following generic name is not recommended for conservation: with a conserved type. The proposal to conserve the generic name against was withdrawn. The following 17 species names are recommended for conservation: () against the sanctioned (); against ; () against and ; () against , , and ; with a conserved type; against (); Y. Nisik. & C. Miyake () against Brond. and ; () against ; Schrad. () against Lam. with a conserved type; () with that spelling; (, ) with a conserved type; () with a conserved type; against , and ; Durieu & Lév. against Saut.; with that spelling; with a conserved type; and with a conserved type. The following 22 species names (teleomorph-typified) are recommended for conservation against anamorph-typified names: against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; against ; and against . The following two species names are not recommended for conservation: against ; and () against . It is recommended that the generic name and the species name not be rejected under Art. 56. The following two species names are recommended for rejection under Art. 56: () and . As a result of reference under Art. 53.5, it is recommended that the following two pairs of names are not to be treated as homonyms: De Not. and Planch.; and (Pers.) Bonord. and Sweet.