Veterinary world | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1793 / 33,944
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Veterinary world

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name Vet World
Abbreviated Name vet world
ISSN 0972-8988
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.veterinaryworld.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (40 total)

2016
Evaluation of five treatments to control intestinal parasites in sheep in Ayapango, state of Mexico
Heredia, Rafael;Aguilar, Emma;Romero, Camilo;Bautista, Linda;Mendoza, Germán;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. 1233-1237
609 views Abstract
2017
Screening method for Staphylococcus aureus identification in subclinical bovine mastitis from dairy farms
Pumipuntu, Natapol;Kulpeanprasit, Suphang;Santajit, Sirijan;Tunyong, Witawat;Kong-ngoen, Thida;Hinthong, Woranich;Indrawattana, Nitaya;
Vol. 10 , No. 7 , pp. 721-726
576 views Abstract
2008
In vitro Antibacterial activity of Pimpinella anisum fruit extracts against some pathogenic bacteria
A.Akhtar, ;A.A.Deshmukh, ;A.V.Bhonsle, ;M.A.Kolekar, P.M. Kshirsagar and;
Vol. 1 , No. 9.000 , pp. 272-274
493 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of phytochemical constituents and sedative-hypnotic activity of the methanol leaf extract of in mice.
Mikail, Hudu Garba;Akumka, David Dezi;Adamu, Mohammed;Zaifada, Aishatu Ummi;
Vol. 12 , No. 6 , pp. 830-833
483 views DOI Abstract
2019
Slaughterhouses sustainability analysis in special capital region of Jakarta Province, Indonesia.
Sidabalok, H A;Macfud, Macfud;Ramli, N;Pandjaitan, N K;
Vol. 12 , No. 6 , pp. 748-757
455 views DOI Abstract
2015
Study on inclusion of probiotic, prebiotic and its combination in broiler diet and their effect on carcass characteristics and economics of commercial broilers.
Saiyed, M A;Joshi, R S;Savaliya, F P;Patel, A B;Mishra, R K;Bhagora, N J;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 225-31
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence of and infections in households sheep "Elevage en case" in Dakar, Senegal.
Dahourou, Laibané Dieudonné;Gbati, Oubri Bassa;Savadogo, Madi;Yougbare, Bernadette;Dicko, Amadou;Combari, Alima Hadjia Banyala;Kamga-Waladjo, Alain Richi;
Vol. 12 , No. 7 , pp. 1028-1032
401 views DOI Abstract
2009
Evaluation of serum profile during various stages of gestation in crossbred deoni cows
Dodamani, Mahesh S.;Mohteshamuddin, Khaja;Awati, S.D.;Tandle, M.K.;Honnappagol, S.S.;
Vol. 2 , No. 10.000 , pp. 398-399
400 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of the heavy metals (mercury, lead, and cadmium) contamination of sardine () and swordfish () fished in three Algerian coasts.
Mehouel, Fetta;Bouayad, Leila;Hammoudi, Abdel Hamid;Ayadi, Ouarda;Regad, Fifi;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 7-11
384 views DOI Abstract
2014
Evaluation of egg quality traits of endangered Nicobari fowl and its crosses under intensive and backyard system of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
Choudhuri, N. C.;Paul, G.;Kundu, A.;Kundu, M. S.;, Arun Kumar De;Ram, Nagesh;
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 693-697
378 views Abstract
View All 40 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.