Indexed in Journament

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning

ISSN 1877-1300· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,322 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 81.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Curr Pharm Teach Learn
Abbreviated Name curr pharm teach learn
ISSN 1877-1300
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/currents-in-pharmacy-teaching-and-learning

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 83.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.1 5.8
Content Distribution 83.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

Game on: The gamification of the pharmacy classroom.
Sera, Leah;Wheeler, Erin;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 155-159
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perception of electronic peer review of SOAP notes among pharmacy students enrolling in their first pharmacotherapeutics course.
Chan, Alexandre;Lee, Joyce Yu-Chia;Han, Zhe;
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1259-1264
422 views DOI Abstract
2018
Student agreement regarding adequacy of didactic content and practical experiences of vaccination clinic business operations.
George, David L;Johnson, Eric J;O'Neal, Katherine S;Smith, Michael J;
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 493-498
420 views DOI Abstract
2018
First generation college students demographic, socio-economic status, academic experience, successes, and challenges at pharmacy schools in the United States.
Afeli, Serge A;Houchins, Tynesha A;Jackson, Nieka S;Montoya, Jacqueline;
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 307-315
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improving advanced pharmacy practice experiences with an intention/reflection practice.
Fierke, Kerry K;Lepp, Gardner A;Maxwell, Whitney D;Hager, Keri D;Sucher, Brandon J;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 394-401
393 views DOI Abstract
2018
Overcoming pitfalls: Results from a mandatory peer review process for written examinations.
Wilby, Kyle John;El Hajj, Maguy S;El-Bashir, Marwa;Mraiche, Fatima;
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 423-426
374 views DOI Abstract
Teachable Moments Matter for: An analysis of the use of Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment (PCOA) scores within one professional program.
Peeters, Michael J;Garavalia, Linda S;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 175-177
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
A web-based review game as a measure of overall course knowledge in pharmacotherapeutics.
Dell, Kamila A;Chudow, Melissa B;
Vol. 11 , No. 8 , pp. 838-842
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Knowledge and comfort change with an active learning activity on medication adherence calculations.
Witry, Matthew J;Urick, Benjamin Y;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 155-159
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploratory implementation of a blended format escape room in a large enrollment pharmacy management class.
Cain, Jeff;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 44-50
361 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessment of English language performance scores and academic performance in an English-based curriculum for pharmacy students with English as a second language.
Tenney, Justin W;Paiva, Maria;Wang, Qianwen;
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 423-428
293 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploratory implementation of a blended format escape room in a large enrollment pharmacy management class.
Cain, Jeff;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 44-50
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of virtual games for interactive learning in a pharmacy curriculum.
Lam, Jerika T;Gutierrez, Mary A;Goad, Jeff A;Odessky, Larisa;Bock, Jason;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 51-57
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perception of electronic peer review of SOAP notes among pharmacy students enrolling in their first pharmacotherapeutics course.
Chan, Alexandre;Lee, Joyce Yu-Chia;Han, Zhe;
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1259-1264
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying the facilitators and barriers for scientific writing among pharmacy students in College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University - A qualitative study.
Alkhuzaee, Fahad Saleh;Al-Mehmadi, Abdulmajeed Ali;Al-Sehly, Adel Aowadh;Nahari, Majed Hassan;Al-Muwallad, Morooj Abdullah;Ali, Majid;
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1265-1273
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
A web-based review game as a measure of overall course knowledge in pharmacotherapeutics.
Dell, Kamila A;Chudow, Melissa B;
Vol. 11 , No. 8 , pp. 838-842
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lifelong learning inspires the creative art of academic writing.
Castleberry, Ashley;Ward, Wendy;Stein, Susan;
Vol. 11 , No. 8 , pp. 757-759
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying and evaluating gaps in knowledge, skills, and qualities necessary for a career in academia.
Peters, Lindsey;Long, Brittany;Eddy, Emily;
Vol. 11 , No. 11 , pp. 1111-1116
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
Knowledge and comfort change with an active learning activity on medication adherence calculations.
Witry, Matthew J;Urick, Benjamin Y;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 155-159
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improving advanced pharmacy practice experiences with an intention/reflection practice.
Fierke, Kerry K;Lepp, Gardner A;Maxwell, Whitney D;Hager, Keri D;Sucher, Brandon J;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 394-401
393 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,322 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

83.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.