Indexed in Journament

ACS chemical neuroscience

ISSN 1948-7193· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,458 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
203 Articles
Scores higher than 81.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ACS Chem Neurosci
Abbreviated Name acs chemical neuroscience
ISSN 1948-7193
URL http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acncdm

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for ACS chemical neuroscience
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 45.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 5.0 7.8
Content Distribution 66.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (203)

2008
chemotherapeutic drugs induce ppar-γ expression and show sequence-specific synergy with ppar-γ ligands in inhibition of non–small cell lung cancer
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. 597-603
831 views DOI Abstract
2005
uroplakin ib gene transcription in urothelial tumor cells is regulated by cpg methylation
Vol. 7 , No. 12 , pp. 1091-1103
520 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel Ferulic Acid Derivatives as Multi-Target-Directed Ligands for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 1008-1024
499 views DOI Abstract
2014
chronic pancreatitis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome prevent impact of chemotherapy with gemcitabine in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer
Vol. 16 , No. 6 , pp. 463-470
482 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gold nanoparticles for X-ray microtomography of neurons.
409 views DOI Abstract
2005
the characteristics of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are caused by two distinct and interchangeable signaling formats
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 397-406
408 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ursodeoxycholic acid inhibits glioblastoma progression via endoplasmic reticulum stress related apoptosis and synergizes with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.
403 views DOI Abstract
2014
breast cancer: coordinated regulation of ccl2 secretion by intracellular glycosaminoglycans and chemokine motifs
Vol. 16 , No. 9 , pp. 723-740
395 views DOI Abstract
2023
Activated Microglia in the Early Stage of a Rat Model of Parkinson's Disease: Revealed by PET-MRI Imaging by [F]DPA-714 Targeting TSPO.
143 views DOI Abstract
2021
2020
Ursodeoxycholic acid inhibits glioblastoma progression via endoplasmic reticulum stress related apoptosis and synergizes with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel Ferulic Acid Derivatives as Multi-Target-Directed Ligands for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 1008-1024
499 views DOI Abstract
2019
1-(2',5'-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3-(2-fluoro-4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-propanone (RGM079): A Positive Allosteric Modulator of α7 Nicotinic Receptors with Analgesic and Neuroprotective Activity.
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. 3900-3909
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel Disassembly Mechanisms of Sigmoid Aβ42 Protofibrils by Introduced Neutral and Charged Drug Molecules.
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinically Approved Drugs against CNS Diseases as Potential Therapeutic Agents To Target Brain-Eating Amoebae.
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 658-666
194 views DOI Abstract
2019
Oleic Acid Coated Silver Nanoparticles Showed Better Amoebicidal Effects against than Amphotericin B.
189 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modeling of the Binding of Octopamine and Dopamine in Insect Monoamine Transporters Reveals Structural and Electrostatic Differences.
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 2310-2317
338 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,458 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

45.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.