ACS chemical neuroscience | Journament

Journal Ranking

#256 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 15 hours ago

ACS chemical neuroscience

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name ACS Chem Neurosci
Abbreviated Name acs chemical neuroscience
ISSN 1948-7193
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (203 total)

2008
chemotherapeutic drugs induce ppar-γ expression and show sequence-specific synergy with ppar-γ ligands in inhibition of non–small cell lung cancer
;Raju C. Reddy;Anjaiah Srirangam;Kaunteya Reddy;Jun Chen;Srinivasareddy Gangireddy;Gregory P. Kalemkerian;Theodore J. Standiford;Venkateshwar G. Keshamouni
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. 597-603
740 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel Ferulic Acid Derivatives as Multi-Target-Directed Ligands for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
Sang, Zhipei;Wang, Keren;Han, Xue;Cao, Mengxiao;Tan, Zhenghuai;Liu, Wenmin;
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 1008-1024
430 views DOI Abstract
2014
chronic pancreatitis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome prevent impact of chemotherapy with gemcitabine in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer
;Richard F. Knoop;Moritz Sparn;Jens Waldmann;Lars Plassmeier;Detlef K. Bartsch;Matthias Lauth;Christoph Hudemann;Volker Fendrich
Vol. 16 , No. 6 , pp. 463-470
407 views DOI Abstract
2005
uroplakin ib gene transcription in urothelial tumor cells is regulated by cpg methylation
;Prue Cowled;Irene Kanter;Lefta Leonardos;Paul Jackson
Vol. 7 , No. 12 , pp. 1091-1103
401 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evidence of the COVID-19 Virus Targeting the CNS: Tissue Distribution, Host-Virus Interaction, and Proposed Neurotropic Mechanisms.
Baig, Abdul Mannan;Khaleeq, Areeba;Ali, Usman;Syeda, Hira;
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reconsideration of anticholinesterase therapeutic strategies against alzheimer's disease
Wang H.
Vol. 10 , pp. 852-862
334 views DOI
2014
breast cancer: coordinated regulation of ccl2 secretion by intracellular glycosaminoglycans and chemokine motifs
;Yaeli Lebel-Haziv;Tsipi Meshel;Gali Soria;Adva Yeheskel;Elad Mamon;Adit Ben-Baruch
Vol. 16 , No. 9 , pp. 723-740
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gold nanoparticles for X-ray microtomography of neurons.
Depannemaecker, Damien;Santos, Luiz E Canton;de Almeida, Antonio-Carlos Guimarães;Ferreira, Gustavo B S;Baraldi, Giovanni L;Miqueles, Eduardo X;Carvalho, Murilo de;Costa, Gabriel Schubert Ruiz;Marques, Marcia J Guimarães;Scorza, Carla A;Rinkel, Jean;
322 views DOI Abstract
2005
the characteristics of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are caused by two distinct and interchangeable signaling formats
;Chengkai Dai;Yelena Lyustikman;Alan Shih;Xiaoyi Hu;Gregory N. Fuller;Marc Rosenblum;Eric C. Holland
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 397-406
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ursodeoxycholic acid inhibits glioblastoma progression via endoplasmic reticulum stress related apoptosis and synergizes with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.
Yao, Zhong;Zhang, Xun;Zhao, Feihu;Wang, Shuai;Chen, Anjing;Huang, Bin;Wang, Jian;Li, Xingang;
295 views DOI Abstract
View All 203 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.