Indexed in Journament

European journal of pediatrics

ISSN 1432-1076· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.2 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #61 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 99.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Eur J Pediatr
Abbreviated Name eur j pediatr
ISSN 1432-1076
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/431

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for European journal of pediatrics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 85.2 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.7 5.8
Content Distribution 66.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2018
Child trafficking in Europe: what is the paediatrician's role? : A statement by the European Academy of Paediatrics.
Vol. 177 , No. 9 , pp. 1419-1423
444 views DOI Abstract
2007
Familial and acquired hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
Vol. 166 , No. 2 , pp. -
428 views Abstract
2015
Contribution of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids to human milk is still low in Hungarian mothers.
Vol. 174 , No. 3 , pp. 393-8
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Formula feeding increases the risk of antibiotic prescriptions in children up to 2 years: results from a cohort study.
404 views DOI Abstract
2016
Cross-sectional study to evaluate the longitudinal development of child and adolescent psychiatric diagnoses of inpatients in Vorarlberg, Austria.
Vol. 175 , No. 2 , pp. 221-8
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recommendation for hygiene and topical in neonatology from the French Neonatal Society.
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social media and children: what is the paediatrician's role?
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality of life and colorectal function in Crohn's disease patients that underwent ileocecal resection during childhood.
Vol. 178 , No. 9 , pp. 1413-1421
344 views DOI Abstract
2020
Single-dose of ondansetron for vomiting in children and adolescents with acute gastroenteritis-an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
339 views DOI Abstract
2025
Dynamics of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) associated to COVID-19: steady severity despite declining cases and new SARS-CoV-2 variants-a single-center cohort study.
Vol. 184 , pp. 327
38 views DOI Abstract
2023
Empowering pediatric providers more: mastering management of common complaints.
126 views DOI
2020
Single-dose of ondansetron for vomiting in children and adolescents with acute gastroenteritis-an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Formula feeding increases the risk of antibiotic prescriptions in children up to 2 years: results from a cohort study.
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality of life and colorectal function in Crohn's disease patients that underwent ileocecal resection during childhood.
Vol. 178 , No. 9 , pp. 1413-1421
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social media and children: what is the paediatrician's role?
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recommendation for hygiene and topical in neonatology from the French Neonatal Society.
359 views DOI Abstract
2018
Child trafficking in Europe: what is the paediatrician's role? : A statement by the European Academy of Paediatrics.
Vol. 177 , No. 9 , pp. 1419-1423
444 views DOI Abstract
2016
Cross-sectional study to evaluate the longitudinal development of child and adolescent psychiatric diagnoses of inpatients in Vorarlberg, Austria.
Vol. 175 , No. 2 , pp. 221-8
404 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
50.2/100 · Average
Ranked #61 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

50.2/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

85.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.