su Ürünleri dergisi | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2819 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

su Ürünleri dergisi

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name su Ürünleri dergisi
Abbreviated Name su Ürünleri dergisi
ISSN 1300-1590
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (138 total)

2015
on the Population Growth of the Cladoceran Ceriodaphnia quadrangula (O. F. Muller, 1785).
Savaş, Sevgi ;Erdoğan, Ömer ;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 113-116
501 views Abstract
2009
Current Situation and Hygiene Practices In Seafood Processing Plants in Aegean and Marmara Regions.
Aral, Nihan ;Baygar, Taçnur ;Kaplan, Muammer ;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 105-110
426 views Abstract
2006
Reducing artemia (Artemia salina L., 1758) use in the rearing of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata
Gamsız, Kutsal ;Alpbaz, Atilla G. ;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 101-106
421 views Abstract
2015
Su Ürünleri İşleyen ve Satan Yerlerde Çalışanların Sanitasyon Konusunda Bilgi Düzeyleri.
Çakır, Fikret ;Çolakoğlu, Fatma Arık ;Berik, Nermin ;
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 377-381
396 views Abstract
2008
Trol ve uzatma ağları ile İzmir körfezinden yakalanan dil (Solea solea) balığının yaşama yüzdesi; kültür şartlarına adaptasyonu ve beslenme davranışı.
Başaran, Fatih ;Aydoğan, Berkan ;Paruğ, Şükrü Şenol ;Metin, Gülnur ;Ulaş, Ali ;Sayğı, Hülya ;Sezen, Bora ;Hoşsucu, Belgin ;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 57-61
386 views Abstract
2015
Apoptosis in Postovulatory Follicles of Chalcalburnus tarichi Pallas, 1811.
Kaptaner, Burak ;Ünal, Güler ;
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 263-267
369 views Abstract
2002
A new dangerous algae from Turkish seas Caulerpa scalpelliformis (R. Brown ex Turner) C. Ag. var. denticulata (Dacaisne) Weber van Bosse (Caulerpaceae, Caulerpales).
Aysel, Veysel ;Şenkardeşler, Ayhan ;Aysel, Fulya ;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. -
359 views
2015
Transgenik Canlılar ve Akuakültürdeki Önemi.
Ekici, Aygül ;Timur, Metin ;Bağış, Haydar ;
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 211-214
343 views Abstract
2017
Türkiye’de ticari çift kabuklu yumuşakça avcılığında kullanılan av araçları
Çolakoğlu, Serhat ;Tokaç, Adnan ;
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 415-421
332 views Abstract
2017
The effects of Brazilian tea (Stachytarpheta jamaicensis) and Bitter kola (Garcinia kola) seed meal on the growth and gonad development of the African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)
Ekanem, Sunday Ben ;Eyo, Victor Oscar ;Okon, Esther Emmanuel ;
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 179-185
329 views Abstract
View All 138 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.