Indexed in Journament

Academic radiology

ISSN 1878-4046· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,921 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 18.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Acad Radiol
Abbreviated Name acad radiol
ISSN 1878-4046
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/academic-radiology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Academic radiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 9.3 5.8
Content Distribution 59.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2019
Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials?
430 views DOI Abstract
2015
Adaptive Tutorials Versus Web-Based Resources in Radiology: A Mixed Methods Comparison of Efficacy and Student Engagement.
Vol. 22 , No. 10 , pp. 1299-307
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Potential Role of Convolutional Neural Network Based Algorithm in Patient Selection for DCIS Observation Trials Using a Mammogram Dataset.
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of Postoperative Changes in Patellar and Quadriceps Tendons after Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Comprehensive Analysis by Shear Wave Elastography, Power Doppler and B-mode Ultrasound.
409 views DOI Abstract
2020
School of Block-Review of Blockchain for the Radiologists.
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 47-57
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gender Differences in Modality Interpretation Among Radiologists: An Exploratory Study of Occupational Horizontal Segregation.
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Use of a Student Radiology Interest Group to Promote Ultrasound Education-A Single Center Experience.
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Generalized Linear Binning to Compare Hyperpolarized Xe Ventilation Maps Derived from 3D Radial Gas Exchange Versus Dedicated Multislice Gradient Echo MRI.
369 views DOI Abstract
2018
Neurometabolites Alteration in the Acute Phase of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI): An In Vivo Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1H-MRS) Study.
Vol. 25 , No. 9 , pp. 1167-1177
368 views DOI Abstract
2022
Prognostic Role of the Pectoralis Musculature in Patients with COVID-19. A Multicenter Study.
144 views DOI Abstract
2021
A Convolutional Neural Network Approach to Quantify Lung Disease Progression in Patients with Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP).
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
School of Block-Review of Blockchain for the Radiologists.
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 47-57
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Noninterpretive Uses of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology.
230 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lipid Fraction Derived From MRI In- and Opposed-Phase Sequence as a Novel Biomarker for Predicting Survival Outcome of Glioma.
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 180-187
304 views DOI Abstract
2020
Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, and Tuberculosis: A Review
Vol. 27 , pp. 71-75
173 views DOI
Journament Score
28.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,921 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.