Indexed in Journament

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer

ISSN 1433-7339· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,366 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
77 Articles
Scores higher than 81.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Support Care Cancer
Abbreviated Name support care cancer
ISSN 1433-7339
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/520

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 66.7 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 8.6 7.8
Content Distribution 42.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (77)

2012
lung fibrosis in deceased hiv-infected patients with pneumocystis pneumonia
;Erica J Shaddock;Guy A Richards;Jill Murray
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 64-67
667 views DOI Abstract
2003
Piperacillin-tazobactam is more effective than ceftriaxone plus gentamicin in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a randomized comparison
Gorschlüter M;Hahn C;Fixson A;Mey U;Ziske C;Molitor E;Horré R;Sauerbruch T;Marklein G;Schmidt-Wolf IG;Glasmacher A;;
Vol. 11 , No. 6 , pp. -
646 views Abstract
2017
the psychosocial impact of caregiving on the family caregivers of chronically ill aids and/or hiv patients in home-based care: a qualitative study in zimbabwe
;Claire van Deventer;Anne Wright
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e7
578 views DOI Abstract
2011
Predicting febrile neutropenic patients at low risk using the MASCC score: does bacteremia matter?
Paesmans M;Klastersky J;Maertens J;Georgala A;Muanza F;Aoun M;Ferrant A;Rapoport B;Rolston K;Ameye L;;
Vol. 19 , No. 7 , pp. -
566 views Abstract
2019
A qualitative analysis of the benefits and barriers of support groups for patients with brain tumours and their caregivers.
Mallya, Sasha;Daniels, Maureen;Kanter, Cheryl;Stone, Alyson;Cipolla, Amanda;Edelstein, Kim;D'Agostino, Norma;
519 views DOI Abstract
2010
Prediction of outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer: evaluation with prognostic factors and Nottingham prognostic index
Liu MT;Huang WT;Wang AY;Huang CC;Huang CY;Chang TH;Pi CP;Yang HH;;
Vol. 18 , No. 12 , pp. -
516 views Abstract
2019
Chemotherapy intravenously in children with cancer at home, the nurse practitioner makes it possible!
Kok, N T M;Ligthart-Beukhof, A C;van de Wetering, M D;
486 views DOI Abstract
1998
Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as an empiric therapy for fever in neutropenic cancer patients
Hess U;Böhme C;Rey K;Senn HJ;;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. -
484 views Abstract
2019
Patient-reported outcomes from a workplace intervention program for cancer survivors highlight ongoing needs to support continuation of work.
Aubel, Dawn;
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
Depression, anxiety and quality of life among women living with breast cancer in Ghana: mediating roles of social support and religiosity.
Kugbey, Nuworza;Oppong Asante, Kwaku;Meyer-Weitz, Anna;
442 views DOI Abstract
2024
Family adjustment and resilience after a parental cancer diagnosis.
Perak, Katarina;McDonald, Fiona E J;Conti, Janet;Yao, Yi Sing;Skrabal Ross, Xiomara;
Vol. 32 , No. 7 , pp. 409
116 views DOI Abstract
2024
Piloting a new cross-sector model of care to support parents with cancer: feasibility and acceptability of the Parent Support Worker role.
Skrabal Ross, X;Konings, S;Schiena, E;Phipps-Nelson, J;Wang, Y;Hodgson, F;Patterson, P;McDonald, F E J;
Vol. 32 , No. 7 , pp. 435
95 views DOI Abstract
2022
Fatigue trajectories during pediatric ALL therapy are associated with fatigue after treatment: a national longitudinal cohort study.
Irestorm, Elin;Steur, Lindsay M H;Kaspers, Gertjan J L;Van Eijkelenburg, Natasha K A;Van der Sluis, Inge M;Dors, Natasja;Van den Bos, Cor;Tissing, Wim J E;Grootenhuis, Martha A;Van Litsenburg, Raphaele R L;
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 1
204 views DOI Abstract
2020
Let us talk about death: gender effects in cancer patients' preferences for end-of-life discussions.
Seifart, C;Riera Knorrenschild, J;Hofmann, M;Nestoriuc, Y;Rief, W;von Blanckenburg, P;
268 views DOI Abstract
2020
The haematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors' sense of coherence about their experiences: a qualitative study.
Sharin, Umairah Bte Mohamed;Hwang, Chung Cheng Jordan;Ang, Wei How Darryl;Lopez, Violeta;
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
A qualitative analysis of the benefits and barriers of support groups for patients with brain tumours and their caregivers.
Mallya, Sasha;Daniels, Maureen;Kanter, Cheryl;Stone, Alyson;Cipolla, Amanda;Edelstein, Kim;D'Agostino, Norma;
519 views DOI Abstract
2019
Guideline adherence in bone-targeted treatment of cancer patients with bone metastases in Germany.
Link, Hartmut;Diel, Ingo;Ohlmann, Carsten-H;Holtmann, Laura;Kerkmann, Markus;, ;
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Problems sleeping with prostate cancer: exploring possible risk factors for sleep disturbance in a population-based sample of survivors.
Maguire, Rebecca;Drummond, Frances J;Hanly, Paul;Gavin, Anna;Sharp, Linda;
Vol. 27 , No. 9 , pp. 3365-3373
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Question prompts to empower cancer patients: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Zetzl, T;Mann, D;Gruner, S;Schuler, M;Jentschke, E;Neuderth, S;Roch, C;van Oorschot, B;
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chemotherapy intravenously in children with cancer at home, the nurse practitioner makes it possible!
Kok, N T M;Ligthart-Beukhof, A C;van de Wetering, M D;
486 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,366 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

42.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.