Indexed in Journament

acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica

ISSN 1399-6576· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.6/100
Journament Score
#6,537
Journament Rank
37
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name acta anaesthesiol scand
Abbreviated Name acta anaesthesiol scand
ISSN 1399-6576
URL http://www.wiley.com/bw/submit.asp?ref=0001-5172

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (37)

2019
Availability and Organization of Difficult Airway Equipment in Swedish Hospitals: A National Survey of Anaesthesiologists.
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Targeted Modification of Erector Spinae Plane Block.
350 views DOI Abstract
2008
Maximal hysteresis: a new method to set positive end-expiratory pressure in acute lung injury?
Vol. 52 , No. 5 , pp. 641-9
336 views DOI Abstract
2015
modernitas dan media: isu nasionalisme
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
284 views DOI Abstract
2017
bila kecemasan mendera tugas konseling mencari solusinya
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 323-341
272 views DOI Abstract
2015
media and modernity: the role of the printing press in the modernization of western society
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 291-301
266 views DOI Abstract
1989
Thoracic paravertebral block: a method of pain control
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 142-145
264 views DOI
2015
muhammad nabi yang dijanjikan
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 133-147
257 views DOI Abstract
2025
A systematic methodological evaluation of sepsis guidelines: Protocol for quality assessment and consistency of recommendations.
Vol. 69 , pp. e70036
53 views DOI Abstract
2019
Targeted Modification of Erector Spinae Plane Block.
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Availability and Organization of Difficult Airway Equipment in Swedish Hospitals: A National Survey of Anaesthesiologists.
367 views DOI Abstract
2018
keteladanan sebagai dakwah kontemporer dalam menyongsong masyarakat modern
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-19
200 views DOI Abstract
2018
feminist therapy islam sebagai alternatif menangani korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 20-31
214 views DOI Abstract
2018
peran ganda guru bimbingan dan konseling di smp diponegoro depok, sleman, yogyakarta
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 55-72
207 views DOI Abstract
2017
wacana kompas terhadap pemberitaan muktamar nu ke-33 dan muhammadiyah ke-47
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 231-252
95 views DOI Abstract
2017
bila kecemasan mendera tugas konseling mencari solusinya
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 323-341
272 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.