south african journal of human resource management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1815 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

south african journal of human resource management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name south african journal of human resource management
Abbreviated Name south african journal of human resource management
ISSN 1683-7584
Aim and Scope
URL https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (65 total)

2017
Managing employee well-being: A qualitative study exploring job and personal resources of at-risk employees
Gauche, Cecile;Beer, Leon T. de;Brink, Lizelle;
Vol. 15 , pp. e1-e13
473 views Abstract
2014
The linkage between work-related factors, employee satisfaction and organisational commitment: Insights from public health professionals
Mafini, Chengedzai;Dlodlo, Nobukhosi;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e12
440 views Abstract
2019
The antecedents of employee engagement and their effect on public sector service delivery: The case study of government departments in Harare
Wushe, Tawaziwa;Shenje, Jacob;
Vol. 17 , pp. e1-e11
429 views Abstract
2015
Should HIV and AIDS workplace programmes still be advocated in the automotive industry?
Steenkamp, Liana;Marwitz, Jill von der;Baasner-Weihs, Friederike;Pietersen, Jacques;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e10
368 views Abstract
2011
The effect of human resource practices on psychological contracts at an iron ore mining company in South Africa
Scheepers, Caren B.;Shuping, Johannes G.;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e11
334 views Abstract
2013
there is no place like home – the house as confinement, character and idealized space in the movie pride and prejudice
;Karina Gomes Barbosa
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 128-145
333 views DOI Abstract
2014
The relation of cognitive learning strategies to psychosocial employability attributes amongst black adult learners in the economic and management sciences field
Coetzee, Melinde;Potgieter, Ingrid L.;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e12
327 views Abstract
1997
a casa dentro da noite: tradição e modernidade na obra de joão de rio
;Chirley Domingues
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 213-224
327 views DOI
2019
A performance management model addressing human factors in the North West provincial administration
Klinck, Kezell;Swanepoel, Sonia;
Vol. 17 , pp. e1-e17
326 views Abstract
2012
the me and the other of the memorialistic writing: a study of the tragic in "são bernardo", by graciliano ramos
;Andréa Trench de Castro
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 88-108
296 views DOI Abstract
View All 65 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
50
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.