Indexed in Journament

south african journal of human resource management

ISSN 1683-7584· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,814 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
65 Articles
Scores higher than 63.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

ชื่อย่อ south african journal of human resource management
ชื่อตัวย่อ south african journal of human resource management
ISSN 1683-7584
URL https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 50.0 17.9
Timeliness 50.0 19.2
Diversity 30.0 28.8
Innovation 40.0 31.2
Community Impact 32.5 13.4
Content Distribution 30.9 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (65)

2017
Managing employee well-being: A qualitative study exploring job and personal resources of at-risk employees
Gauche, Cecile;Beer, Leon T. de;Brink, Lizelle;
Vol. 15 , pp. e1-e13
514 views Abstract
2014
The linkage between work-related factors, employee satisfaction and organisational commitment: Insights from public health professionals
Mafini, Chengedzai;Dlodlo, Nobukhosi;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e12
489 views Abstract
2019
The antecedents of employee engagement and their effect on public sector service delivery: The case study of government departments in Harare
Wushe, Tawaziwa;Shenje, Jacob;
Vol. 17 , pp. e1-e11
465 views Abstract
2015
Should HIV and AIDS workplace programmes still be advocated in the automotive industry?
Steenkamp, Liana;Marwitz, Jill von der;Baasner-Weihs, Friederike;Pietersen, Jacques;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e10
412 views Abstract
2013
there is no place like home – the house as confinement, character and idealized space in the movie pride and prejudice
;Karina Gomes Barbosa
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 128-145
375 views DOI Abstract
2014
The relation of cognitive learning strategies to psychosocial employability attributes amongst black adult learners in the economic and management sciences field
Coetzee, Melinde;Potgieter, Ingrid L.;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e12
370 views Abstract
1997
a casa dentro da noite: tradição e modernidade na obra de joão de rio
;Chirley Domingues
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 213-224
368 views DOI
2011
The effect of human resource practices on psychological contracts at an iron ore mining company in South Africa
Scheepers, Caren B.;Shuping, Johannes G.;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e11
361 views Abstract
2019
A performance management model addressing human factors in the North West provincial administration
Klinck, Kezell;Swanepoel, Sonia;
Vol. 17 , pp. e1-e17
359 views Abstract
2012
the me and the other of the memorialistic writing: a study of the tragic in "são bernardo", by graciliano ramos
;Andréa Trench de Castro
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 88-108
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
The antecedents of employee engagement and their effect on public sector service delivery: The case study of government departments in Harare
Wushe, Tawaziwa;Shenje, Jacob;
Vol. 17 , pp. e1-e11
465 views Abstract
2019
A performance management model addressing human factors in the North West provincial administration
Klinck, Kezell;Swanepoel, Sonia;
Vol. 17 , pp. e1-e17
359 views Abstract
2017
o engajamento como discurso literário: uma leitura de zero zero zero, de roberto saviano
;Gisele Maria Nascimento Palmieri
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 188-191
57 views DOI
2017
Managing employee well-being: A qualitative study exploring job and personal resources of at-risk employees
Gauche, Cecile;Beer, Leon T. de;Brink, Lizelle;
Vol. 15 , pp. e1-e13
514 views Abstract
2016
pôncio pilatos: o simulacro
;Égide Guareschi
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 193-197
20 views DOI
2016
mário de sá-carneiro: evidence of a myth, evidence of a body
;Matheus Nogueira Schwartzmann
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 56-78
21 views DOI Abstract
2016
trabalho e malandragem em marafa, de marques rebelo
;Manoel Freire;Maria Clediane de Oliveira
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 193-209
125 views DOI Abstract
2016
expediente
;Comissão Editorial
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
22 views DOI
2016
owl, werewolf, firefly: animal trace narrator
;Raquel Wandelli Loth
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 11-31
93 views DOI Abstract
2016
the revisited experience: the natural cunnings of guimarães rosa’s narrative
;André Rocha Leite Haudenschild
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 81-91
100 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,814 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

30.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.