Indexed in Journament

Journal of sex research

ISSN 1559-8519· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,923 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
54 Articles
Scores higher than 25.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Sex Res
Abbreviated Name j sex res
ISSN 1559-8519
URL http://www.sexscience.org/resources/journal_of_sex_research

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 38.9 25.8
Innovation 54.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.9 7.8
Content Distribution 30.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (54)

2019
Forgive and Forget?: Examining the Influence of Blame and Intentionality on Forgiveness Following Hypothetical Same-Sex Infidelity in the Context of Heterosexual Romantic Relationships.
Denes, Amanda;Dillow, Megan R;DelGreco, Maria;Lannutti, Pamela J;Bevan, Jennifer L;
, pp. 1-16
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Meta-Analysis on the Association Between Rape Myth Acceptance and Sexual Coercion Perpetration.
Trottier, Dominique;Benbouriche, Massil;Bonneville, Véronique;
, pp. 1-8
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Romantic Jealousy: A Test of Social Cognitive and Evolutionary Models in A Population-Representative Sample of Adults.
de Visser, Richard;Richters, Juliet;Rissel, Chris;Grulich, Andrew;Simpson, Judy;Rodrigues, David;Lopes, Diniz;
, pp. 1-10
384 views DOI Abstract
2016
Sexual Behavior Among Young Carers in the Context of a Kenyan Empowerment Program Combining Cash-Transfer, Psychosocial Support, and Entrepreneurship.
Goodman, Michael L;Selwyn, Beatrice J;Morgan, Robert O;Lloyd, Linda E;Mwongera, Moses;Gitari, Stanley;Keiser, Philip H;
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. 331-45
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Motives and Manifestations of Sex as Self-Injury.
Fredlund, Cecilia;Wadsby, Marie;Jonsson, Linda S;
, pp. 1-9
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adolescents' Sexual Encounters With Either Romantic or Casual Partners and the Quality of Their Romantic Relationships Four Years Later.
Shulman, Shmuel;Scharf, Miri;Ziv, Ido;Norona, Jerika;Welsh, Deborah P;
, pp. 1-11
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Once a Poacher Always a Poacher? Mate Poaching History and its Association with Relationship Quality.
Belu, Charlene F;O'Sullivan, Lucia F;
, pp. 1-14
373 views DOI Abstract
2020
Generation by Gender Differences in Use of Sexual Aggression: A Replication of the Millennial Shift.
Anderson, Peter B;Struckman-Johnson, Cindy;Smeaton, George L;
, pp. 1-13
340 views DOI Abstract
2010
Dance and sexuality: many moves.
Hanna, Judith Lynne;
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 212-41
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Following Their Lead? Connecting Mainstream Media Use to Black Women’s Gender Beliefs and Sexual Agency
Ward, L.
, pp. 0-0
318 views DOI
2023
Acceptability of 'Humpr': An Online Tool to Educate Adolescent Sexual Minority Males About Sexual Networking Applications.
Wongsomboon, Val;Queiroz, Artur Afln;Alvarado Avila, Andrés;Mongrella, Melissa;Saber, Rana;Li, Dennis H;Moskowitz, David A;Mustanski, Brian;Macapagal, Kathryn;
, pp. 1-10
131 views DOI Abstract
2020
Generation by Gender Differences in Use of Sexual Aggression: A Replication of the Millennial Shift.
Anderson, Peter B;Struckman-Johnson, Cindy;Smeaton, George L;
, pp. 1-13
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Meta-Analysis on the Association Between Rape Myth Acceptance and Sexual Coercion Perpetration.
Trottier, Dominique;Benbouriche, Massil;Bonneville, Véronique;
, pp. 1-8
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adolescents' Sexual Encounters With Either Romantic or Casual Partners and the Quality of Their Romantic Relationships Four Years Later.
Shulman, Shmuel;Scharf, Miri;Ziv, Ido;Norona, Jerika;Welsh, Deborah P;
, pp. 1-11
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Motives and Manifestations of Sex as Self-Injury.
Fredlund, Cecilia;Wadsby, Marie;Jonsson, Linda S;
, pp. 1-9
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Following Their Lead? Connecting Mainstream Media Use to Black Women’s Gender Beliefs and Sexual Agency
Ward, L.
, pp. 0-0
318 views DOI
2019
Romantic Jealousy: A Test of Social Cognitive and Evolutionary Models in A Population-Representative Sample of Adults.
de Visser, Richard;Richters, Juliet;Rissel, Chris;Grulich, Andrew;Simpson, Judy;Rodrigues, David;Lopes, Diniz;
, pp. 1-10
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Once a Poacher Always a Poacher? Mate Poaching History and its Association with Relationship Quality.
Belu, Charlene F;O'Sullivan, Lucia F;
, pp. 1-14
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Forgive and Forget?: Examining the Influence of Blame and Intentionality on Forgiveness Following Hypothetical Same-Sex Infidelity in the Context of Heterosexual Romantic Relationships.
Denes, Amanda;Dillow, Megan R;DelGreco, Maria;Lannutti, Pamela J;Bevan, Jennifer L;
, pp. 1-16
449 views DOI Abstract
2016
Sexual Behavior Among Young Carers in the Context of a Kenyan Empowerment Program Combining Cash-Transfer, Psychosocial Support, and Entrepreneurship.
Goodman, Michael L;Selwyn, Beatrice J;Morgan, Robert O;Lloyd, Linda E;Mwongera, Moses;Gitari, Stanley;Keiser, Philip H;
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. 331-45
381 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,923 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

54.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

30.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.