Indexed in Journament

journal of clinical medicine

ISSN 2077-0383· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
45.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #557 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
253 Articles
Scores higher than 98% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Aims Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: Original research articles are particularly welcomed. Systematic reviews are also accepted. Pre-clinical studies using animal models are not accepted. Research subject should only be human patients. Survey-based studies are not accepted. Since 2019, short/mini reviews are not considered anymore. Since 2019, case reports are not considered anymore. Subject areas: Clinical Laboratory Diagnosis and Therapy of Internal Medicine Diseases Traumatology and Precise Surgical Techniques Genomics, Proteomics, and Bioinformatics in Clinical Cancer Research Epidemiology Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders Advanced Research in Dermatology and Venereology Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Medical Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Rehabilitation Medicine and Physiotherapy Sports Medicine Pediatric and Geriatric Emergency Care Women’s Health
Short Name j clin med
Abbreviated Name jcm
ISSN 2077-0383
URL https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm
Author Instructions https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm/instructions

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of clinical medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 32.7 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 23.1
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 67.0 26.1
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 11.4 4.2
Content Distribution 75.0 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (253)

2020
Role of Reconstructive Microsurgery in Tubal Infertility in Young Women
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 1300-
684 views DOI Abstract
2020
Low Galectin-3 Expression Level in Primary Tumors Is Associated with Metastasis in T1 Lung Adenocarcinoma
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 1990-
669 views DOI Abstract
2019
State of Art of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Neutropenia or Agranulocytosis, with a Focus on Biotherapies.
Vol. 8 , No. 9
628 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design, Characterization, and Evaluation of scFvCD133/rGelonin: A CD133-Targeting Recombinant Immunotoxin for Use in Combination with Photochemical Internalization.
Vol. 9 , No. 1
624 views DOI Abstract
2020
Risk for Depressive Symptoms among Hospitalized Women in High-Risk Pregnancy Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. 2449-
588 views DOI Abstract
2020
Early Pregnancy Vitamin D Binding Protein Is Independently Associated with the Development of Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 2186-
569 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Novel Technique of Endoscopic Papillectomy with Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Ampullary Tumors: A Proof-of-Concept Study (with Video)
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. 2671-
562 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pattern of Recurrence and Patient Survival after Perioperative Chemotherapy with 5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel (FLOT) for Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma in Patients Treated Outside Clinical Trials
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. 2654-
554 views DOI Abstract
2019
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Altered Immune System Leading to Susceptibility to Pathogens, Especially .
Vol. 8 , No. 12
545 views DOI Abstract
2024
Cardiothoracic Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension after Pulmonary Endarterectomy or Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty: A Scoping Review.
Vol. 13 , No. 17
146 views DOI Abstract
2024
Outcomes in the Treatment of Subretinal Macular Hemorrhage Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review.
Vol. 13 , No. 2
171 views DOI Abstract
2023
Performance and Safety of a Reflux-Control Microcatheter Used to Perform DEB-TACE with LUMI Beads in HCC Patients: Preliminary Experience.
Vol. 12 , No. 20
140 views DOI Abstract
2023
Early versus Late Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Vitreous Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review.
Vol. 12 , No. 20
189 views DOI Abstract
2022
Pulmonary Embolism Presenting with Pulmonary Infarction: Update and Practical Review of Literature Data.
Vol. 11 , No. 16
112 views DOI Abstract
2022
Age-Based Tracks: A Method to Tailor Autism Diagnostic Evaluation in Large-Scale Autism Specialty Centers
Vol. 11 , No. 21 , pp. 6332-
104 views Abstract
2022
Colostomy Reversal following Hartmann's Procedure: The Importance of Timing in Short- and Long-Term Complications: A Retrospective Multicentric Study.
Vol. 11 , No. 15
180 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
45.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #557 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

45.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

32.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

67.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.