Indexed in Journament

Journal of hazardous materials

ISSN 1873-3336· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
48.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #146 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
357 Articles
Scores higher than 99.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Hazard Mater
Abbreviated Name journal of hazardous materials
ISSN 1873-3336
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-hazardous-materials

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of hazardous materials
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 60.0 12.6
Diversity 69.4 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 7.1 9.7
Content Distribution 74.6 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (357)

2020
Selective and efficient adsorption of Au (III) in aqueous solution by Zr-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): An unconventional way for gold recycling.
Vol. 391 , pp. 122175
714 views DOI Abstract
2011
Optimization of Orange G dye adsorption by activated carbon of Thespesia populnea pods using response surface methodology.
Vol. 186 , No. 1 , pp. 827-34
607 views DOI Abstract
2018
Recent developments in nanostructured inorganic materials for sorption of cesium and strontium: Synthesis and shaping, sorption capacity, mechanisms, and selectivity-A review.
Vol. 344 , pp. 511-530
529 views DOI Abstract
2011
A coagulation-powdered activated carbon-ultrafiltration--multiple barrier approach for removing toxins from two Australian cyanobacterial blooms.
Vol. 186 , No. 2-3 , pp. 1553-9
505 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of nonredox metal ions on the activation of peroxymonosulfate for organic pollutants degradation in aqueous solution with cobalt based catalysts: A new mechanism investigation.
Vol. 382 , pp. 121081
492 views DOI Abstract
2010
Adsorption of volatile organic compounds onto activated carbon cloths derived from a novel regenerated cellulosic precursor
Vol. 177 , No. 1-3 , pp. 175-182
477 views DOI
2020
Efficient and stable catalysis of hollow CuS nanospheres in the Fenton-like degradation of organic dyes.
Vol. 396 , pp. 122735
465 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molybdenum and cadmium co-induce oxidative stress and apoptosis through mitochondria-mediated pathway in duck renal tubular epithelial cells.
Vol. 383 , pp. 121157
452 views DOI Abstract
2025
Degradation of microplastics by electrocoagulation technology: Combination oxidation and flocculation effects.
Vol. 493 , pp. 138379
108 views DOI Abstract
2022
A systematic review of gold extraction: Fundamentals, advancements, and challenges toward alternative lixiviants.
Vol. 440 , pp. 129778
185 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
48.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #146 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

48.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

69.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.