Journal of hazardous materials | Journament

Journal Ranking

#107 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
48
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Journal of hazardous materials

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name J Hazard Mater
Abbreviated Name journal of hazardous materials
ISSN 1873-3336
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (357 total)

2020
Selective and efficient adsorption of Au (III) in aqueous solution by Zr-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): An unconventional way for gold recycling.
Chang, Ziyong;Li, Fangxu;Qi, Xiaoyue;Jiang, Bo;Kou, Jue;Sun, Chunbao;
Vol. 391 , pp. 122175
628 views DOI Abstract
2011
Optimization of Orange G dye adsorption by activated carbon of Thespesia populnea pods using response surface methodology.
Arulkumar, M;Sathishkumar, P;Palvannan, T;
Vol. 186 , No. 1 , pp. 827-34
521 views DOI Abstract
2018
Recent developments in nanostructured inorganic materials for sorption of cesium and strontium: Synthesis and shaping, sorption capacity, mechanisms, and selectivity-A review.
Alby, Delhia;Charnay, Clarence;Heran, Marc;Prelot, Bénédicte;Zajac, Jerzy;
Vol. 344 , pp. 511-530
437 views DOI Abstract
2011
A coagulation-powdered activated carbon-ultrafiltration--multiple barrier approach for removing toxins from two Australian cyanobacterial blooms.
Dixon, Mike B;Richard, Yann;Ho, Lionel;Chow, Christopher W K;O'Neill, Brian K;Newcombe, Gayle;
Vol. 186 , No. 2-3 , pp. 1553-9
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of nonredox metal ions on the activation of peroxymonosulfate for organic pollutants degradation in aqueous solution with cobalt based catalysts: A new mechanism investigation.
Xu, Aihua;Wei, Yi;Zou, Qiancheng;Zhang, Wenyu;Jin, Yezi;Wang, Zeyu;Yang, Lizhen;Li, Xiaoxia;
Vol. 382 , pp. 121081
398 views DOI Abstract
2020
Waste-derived compost and biochar amendments for stormwater treatment in bioretention column: Co-transport of metals and colloids
Sun, Y.
Vol. 383 , pp. 0-0
386 views DOI
2010
Adsorption of volatile organic compounds onto activated carbon cloths derived from a novel regenerated cellulosic precursor
Ramos, M.E.;Bonelli, P.R.;Cukierman, A.L.;Ribeiro Carrott, M.M.L.;Carrott, P.J.M.
Vol. 177 , No. 1-3 , pp. 175-182
386 views DOI
2019
Shape-tunable CuO-Nd(OH)<inf>3</inf> nanocomposites with excellent adsorption capacity in organic dye removal and regeneration of spent adsorbent to reduce secondary waste
Sarma, G.
, pp. 0-0
382 views DOI
2020
Efficient and stable catalysis of hollow CuS nanospheres in the Fenton-like degradation of organic dyes.
Luo, Xiaolin;Hu, Huanting;Pan, Zhe;Pei, Fei;Qian, Huaming;Miao, Kangkang;Guo, Sifan;Wang, Wei;Feng, Guodong;
Vol. 396 , pp. 122735
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Occurrence of plastic additives in outdoor air particulate matters from two industrial parks of Tarragona, Spain: Human inhalation intake risk assessment
Maceira, A.
, pp. 649-659
361 views DOI
View All 357 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
48
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

48.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.