Indexed in Journament

gynecologic oncology

ISSN 1095-6859· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,391 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 78.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name gynecol oncol
Abbreviated Name gynecol oncol
ISSN 1095-6859
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622840/description#description

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 12.9
Content Distribution 76.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for gynecologic oncology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 12.9 5.8
Content Distribution 76.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2011
Docetaxel plus trabectedin appears active in recurrent or persistent ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer after up to three prior regimens: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.
Vol. 120 , No. 3 , pp. 459-63
466 views DOI Abstract
2016
Sentinel lymph node mapping with staging lymphadenectomy for patients with endometrial cancer increases the detection of metastasis
Vol. 141 , No. 2 , pp. -
409 views Abstract
2019
Lymph node micrometastases and outcome of endometrial cancer
Vol. 154 , No. 3 , pp. -
406 views Abstract
2019
Gemcitabine for recurrent ovarian cancer - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Defining the molecular evolution of extrauterine high grade serous carcinoma.
357 views DOI Abstract
2017
Comparison of outcomes for MR-guided versus CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in women with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.
Vol. 145 , No. 2 , pp. 284-290
350 views DOI Abstract
2014
acute coronary syndrome with st elevation (stemi): prehospital trombolitic therapy
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 71-77
345 views Abstract
2020
The risk of cervical cancer after cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: A population-based cohort study with 80,442 women.
339 views DOI Abstract
2020
Fertility and prognosis of borderline ovarian tumor after conservative management: Results of the multicentric OPTIBOT study by the GINECO & TMRG group.
Vol. 157 , No. 1 , pp. 29-35
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gender variation in Medicare utilization and payments in gynecologic oncology.
319 views DOI Abstract
2020
Fertility and prognosis of borderline ovarian tumor after conservative management: Results of the multicentric OPTIBOT study by the GINECO & TMRG group.
Vol. 157 , No. 1 , pp. 29-35
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
The risk of cervical cancer after cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: A population-based cohort study with 80,442 women.
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lymph node micrometastases and outcome of endometrial cancer
Vol. 154 , No. 3 , pp. -
406 views Abstract
2019
Gemcitabine for recurrent ovarian cancer - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Defining the molecular evolution of extrauterine high grade serous carcinoma.
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gender variation in Medicare utilization and payments in gynecologic oncology.
319 views DOI Abstract
2017
Comparison of outcomes for MR-guided versus CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in women with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.
Vol. 145 , No. 2 , pp. 284-290
350 views DOI Abstract
2016
headache as a sign of a serious disease: case report
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 71-75
88 views Abstract
2016
Sentinel lymph node mapping with staging lymphadenectomy for patients with endometrial cancer increases the detection of metastasis
Vol. 141 , No. 2 , pp. -
409 views Abstract
2015
anahpylactic shock after snake bite
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 54-59
169 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,391 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.