Fertility and prognosis of borderline ovarian tumor after conservative management: Results of the multicentric OPTIBOT study by the GINECO & TMRG group.
Clicks: 337
ID: 103825
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
337 views
59 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #9 of 14 articles by views in gynecologic oncology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Description of fertility and prognosis of patients with borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) treated by fertility-sparing surgery through a longitudinal study from the French national cancer network.All consecutive patients diagnosed with BOT from the French National Network dedicated to Ovarian Malignant Rare Tumors from 2010 and 2017 were selected. In 2018, an update was made by sending a questionnaire regarding recurrence and fertility to patients aged under 43 years at diagnosis and treated conservatively. We compared the characteristics of the patients with/without recurrence and with/without live birth.Fifty-two patients aged 18 to 42 years presented a desire of pregnancy. Thirty patients (58%) presented a FIGO IA tumor, and 20 patients were treated by bilateral cystectomies (38%). We observed at least one live birth for 33 patients (63%) and local recurrences in 20 patients (38%). Both recurrence and live birth in 17 patients (33%) were reported, with recurrence occurring before pregnancy, after a second fertility-sparing treatment, in half of the cases. No factors associated with recurrence or live birth in this study were identified. Moreover, in this population, both recurrence and live birth were independent of age, with a linear risk along time. Disease-free survival was worse for patients treated with bilateral cystectomy (n = 20, 38%), with no difference in terms of fertility.Two third of the patients experienced life birth after conservation surgery. We did not highlight an age/time from surgery for which the risk of recurrence outweighs the chance of pregnancy and to radicalize surgery. Moreover, almost a quarter of the live birth occurred after recurrence, with no more further event to date in these patients. The results encourage to consider a second fertility-sparing surgery after local borderline recurrence in the case of pregnancy desire. All these decisions must be discussed in specialized multidisciplinary boards.
| Reference Key |
chevrot2020fertilitygynecologic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Chevrot, Audrey;Pouget, Nicolas;Bats, Anne-Sophie;Huchon, Cyrille;Guyon, Frédéric;Chopin, Nicolas;Rousset-Jablonski, Christine;Beurrier, Frédéric;Lambaudie, Eric;Provansal, Magali;Sabatier, Renaud;Heinemann, Mellie;Ngo, Charlotte;Bonsang-Kitzis, Hélène;Lecuru, Fabrice;Bailly, Emmanuel;Ferron, Gwenaël;Cornou, Caroline;Lardin, Elise;Leblanc, Eric;Philip, Charles-André;Ray-Coquard, Isabelle;Hequet, Delphine; |
| Journal | gynecologic oncology |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
S0090-8258(19)31876-1
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.