Indexed in Journament

journal of the american academy of orthopaedic surgeons global research & reviews

ISSN 2474-7661· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.8/100
Journament Score
#3,531
Journament Rank
15
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j am acad orthop surg glob res rev
Abbreviated Name j am acad orthop surg glob res rev
ISSN 2474-7661
URL https://journals.lww.com/jaaosglobal/pages/default.aspx

Indexings

ncbi

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2014
the effects of pronated foot posture and medial heel and sole wedge
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. -
448 views DOI Abstract
2014
تعیین شاخص قوس کف پا در مقاطع سنی مختلف زنان و مردان شهر اصفهان
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. -
373 views DOI Abstract
2018
the effect of a combined training program on physical fitness factors among deaf boy students: a randomized clinical trial study
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 153-161
346 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Effect of an Orthopaedic Surgeon's Attire on Patient Perceptions of Surgeon Traits and Identity: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Vol. 4 , No. 8 , pp. e2000097-11
312 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship Between Baseline Patient-reported Outcomes and Demographic, Psychosocial, and Clinical Characteristics: A Retrospective Study.
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. e039
307 views DOI Abstract
2017
efficiency of assistant robots in cochlear implant surgery: a systematic review
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 51-59
301 views DOI Abstract
2015
effect of cognitive training on efficiency of executive control network of attention
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 182-192
267 views DOI Abstract
2010
بررسي پايايي آزمون‌هاي عملكردي زانو در افراد مبتلا به سندرم درد كشككي- راني
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. -
245 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Effect of an Orthopaedic Surgeon's Attire on Patient Perceptions of Surgeon Traits and Identity: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Vol. 4 , No. 8 , pp. e2000097-11
312 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship Between Baseline Patient-reported Outcomes and Demographic, Psychosocial, and Clinical Characteristics: A Retrospective Study.
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. e039
307 views DOI Abstract
2018
the effect of a combined training program on physical fitness factors among deaf boy students: a randomized clinical trial study
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 153-161
346 views DOI Abstract
2017
efficiency of assistant robots in cochlear implant surgery: a systematic review
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 51-59
301 views DOI Abstract
2015
effect of cognitive training on efficiency of executive control network of attention
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 182-192
267 views DOI Abstract
2014
the effect of neck stabilization exercises in improving of forward head posture in the 20-27 years –old female students
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. 1222-31
186 views DOI Abstract
2014
facilitating and deterrent factors in learning practical skills from the viewpoints of the rehabilitation students, third year onwards
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. -
174 views DOI Abstract
2014
the effects of pronated foot posture and medial heel and sole wedge
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. -
448 views DOI Abstract
2014
تعیین شاخص قوس کف پا در مقاطع سنی مختلف زنان و مردان شهر اصفهان
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. -
373 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.