Indexed in Journament

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

ISSN 2212-2672· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.4/100
Journament Score
#5,232
Journament Rank
15
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name J Acad Nutr Diet
Abbreviated Name j acad nutr diet
ISSN 2212-2672
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-the-academy-of-nutrition-and-dietetics

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2019
Challenges, Opportunities, and Motivators for Developing and Applying Food Literacy in a University Setting: A Qualitative Study.
Malan, Hannah;Watson, Tyler D;Slusser, Wendelin;Glik, Deborah;Rowat, Amy C;Prelip, Michael;
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Medical Nutrition Therapy: A Multisite Study Documenting the Efficacy of Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Interventions in the Management of Glycemic Control and Diabetic Dyslipidemia through Retrospective Chart Review
Marincic, P.
Vol. 119 , pp. 449-463
358 views DOI
2020
The Influence of the New US Nutrition Facts Label on Consumer Perceptions and Understanding of Added Sugars: A Randomized Controlled Experiment.
Khandpur, Neha;Rimm, Eric B;Moran, Alyssa J;
Vol. 120 , No. 2 , pp. 197-209
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative: A Multiyear Partnership Transforms Care.
McCauley, Sharon M;Mitchell, Kristi;Heap, Amie;
Vol. 119 , No. 9S2 , pp. S18-S24
343 views DOI Abstract
2015
Rheological characteristics of cold thickened beverages containing xanthan gum-based food thickeners used for dysphagia diets
Cho, H.
Vol. 115 , pp. 106-111
343 views DOI
2019
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2019 Standards of Professional Performance for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (Competent, Proficient, and Expert) in Clinical Nutrition Management.
Doley, Jennifer;Clark, Krista;Roper, Shaynee;
Vol. 119 , No. 9 , pp. 1545-1560.e32
332 views DOI Abstract
2013
Monitoring sodium intake of the US population: impact and implications of a change in what we eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dietary data processing.
Sebastian, Rhonda S;Wilkinson Enns, Cecilia;Steinfeldt, Lois C;Goldman, Joseph D;Moshfegh, Alanna J;
Vol. 113 , No. 7 , pp. 942-9
323 views DOI Abstract
2017
Influence of Cartoon Media Characters on Children's Attention to and Preference for Food and Beverage Products
Ogle, A.
Vol. 117 , pp. 265-270.e2
297 views DOI
2019
Hospital Nutrition Care Betters Patient Clinical Outcomes and Reduces Costs: The Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative Story
McCauley, S.
Vol. 119 , pp. S11-S14
296 views DOI
2017
What Is the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative?
Marcason, W.
Vol. 117 , pp. 652
261 views DOI
2023
The Ability of Nutrition Warning Labels to Improve Understanding and Choice Outcomes Among Consumers Demonstrating Preferences for Unhealthy Foods.
Pettigrew, Simone;Jongenelis, Michelle;Maganja, Damian;Hercberg, Serge;Julia, Chantal;
94 views DOI Abstract
2020
Utility of the Flipped Classroom When Teaching Clinical Nutrition Material
Riddle, E.
Vol. 120 , pp. 351-358
188 views DOI
2020
The Influence of the New US Nutrition Facts Label on Consumer Perceptions and Understanding of Added Sugars: A Randomized Controlled Experiment.
Khandpur, Neha;Rimm, Eric B;Moran, Alyssa J;
Vol. 120 , No. 2 , pp. 197-209
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Qualitative Research on the Real-Time Decision Making of WIC Participants While Food Shopping: Use of Think-Aloud Methodology
Robson, S.
Vol. 120 , pp. 111-119
153 views DOI
2019
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Medical Nutrition Therapy: A Multisite Study Documenting the Efficacy of Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Interventions in the Management of Glycemic Control and Diabetic Dyslipidemia through Retrospective Chart Review
Marincic, P.
Vol. 119 , pp. 449-463
358 views DOI
2019
Hospital Nutrition Care Betters Patient Clinical Outcomes and Reduces Costs: The Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative Story
McCauley, S.
Vol. 119 , pp. S11-S14
296 views DOI
2019
Protein Energy Malnutrition Is Associated with Worse Outcomes in Sepsis—A Nationwide Analysis
Adejumo, A.
Vol. 119 , pp. 2069-2084
153 views DOI
2019
Challenges, Opportunities, and Motivators for Developing and Applying Food Literacy in a University Setting: A Qualitative Study.
Malan, Hannah;Watson, Tyler D;Slusser, Wendelin;Glik, Deborah;Rowat, Amy C;Prelip, Michael;
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2019 Standards of Professional Performance for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (Competent, Proficient, and Expert) in Clinical Nutrition Management.
Doley, Jennifer;Clark, Krista;Roper, Shaynee;
Vol. 119 , No. 9 , pp. 1545-1560.e32
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality Improvement as the Foundation for Health Care Advancement.
Blankenship, Jeanne;Blancato, Robert B;Kelly, Robin;
Vol. 119 , No. 9S2 , pp. S15-S17
148 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.