Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2287 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name J Acad Nutr Diet
Abbreviated Name j acad nutr diet
ISSN 2212-2672
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-the-academy-of-nutrition-and-dietetics
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2019
Challenges, Opportunities, and Motivators for Developing and Applying Food Literacy in a University Setting: A Qualitative Study.
Malan, Hannah;Watson, Tyler D;Slusser, Wendelin;Glik, Deborah;Rowat, Amy C;Prelip, Michael;
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Medical Nutrition Therapy: A Multisite Study Documenting the Efficacy of Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Interventions in the Management of Glycemic Control and Diabetic Dyslipidemia through Retrospective Chart Review
Marincic, P.
Vol. 119 , pp. 449-463
342 views DOI
2019
The Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative: A Multiyear Partnership Transforms Care.
McCauley, Sharon M;Mitchell, Kristi;Heap, Amie;
Vol. 119 , No. 9S2 , pp. S18-S24
327 views DOI Abstract
2015
Rheological characteristics of cold thickened beverages containing xanthan gum-based food thickeners used for dysphagia diets
Cho, H.
Vol. 115 , pp. 106-111
327 views DOI
2020
The Influence of the New US Nutrition Facts Label on Consumer Perceptions and Understanding of Added Sugars: A Randomized Controlled Experiment.
Khandpur, Neha;Rimm, Eric B;Moran, Alyssa J;
Vol. 120 , No. 2 , pp. 197-209
322 views DOI Abstract
2019
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2019 Standards of Professional Performance for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (Competent, Proficient, and Expert) in Clinical Nutrition Management.
Doley, Jennifer;Clark, Krista;Roper, Shaynee;
Vol. 119 , No. 9 , pp. 1545-1560.e32
312 views DOI Abstract
2013
Monitoring sodium intake of the US population: impact and implications of a change in what we eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dietary data processing.
Sebastian, Rhonda S;Wilkinson Enns, Cecilia;Steinfeldt, Lois C;Goldman, Joseph D;Moshfegh, Alanna J;
Vol. 113 , No. 7 , pp. 942-9
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hospital Nutrition Care Betters Patient Clinical Outcomes and Reduces Costs: The Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative Story
McCauley, S.
Vol. 119 , pp. S11-S14
278 views DOI
2017
Influence of Cartoon Media Characters on Children's Attention to and Preference for Food and Beverage Products
Ogle, A.
Vol. 117 , pp. 265-270.e2
268 views DOI
2017
What Is the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative?
Marcason, W.
Vol. 117 , pp. 652
242 views DOI
View All 15 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.