analytica chimica acta | Journament

Journal Ranking

#93 / 33,784
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 14 hours ago

analytica chimica acta

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name anal chim acta
Abbreviated Name analytica chimica acta
ISSN 1873-4324
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (84 total)

2016
Innovative combination of QuEChERS extraction with on-line solid-phase extract purification and pre-concentration, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and their metabolites in sewage sludge.
Rossini, D;Ciofi, L;Ancillotti, C;Checchini, L;Bruzzoniti, M C;Rivoira, L;Fibbi, D;Orlandini, S;Del Bubba, M;
Vol. 935 , pp. 269-81
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
In-vivo solid phase microextraction for quantitative analysis of volatile organoselenium compounds in plants.
Moreno-Martin, Gustavo;Sanz-Landaluze, Jon;León-Gonzalez, María Eugenia;Madrid, Yolanda;
Vol. 1081 , pp. 72-80
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Deep learning for vibrational spectral analysis: Recent progress and a practical guide.
Yang, Jie;Xu, Jinfan;Zhang, Xiaolei;Wu, Chiyu;Lin, Tao;Ying, Yibin;
Vol. 1081 , pp. 6-17
398 views DOI Abstract
2006
Analytical applications of room-temperature ionic liquids: a review of recent efforts.
Pandey, Siddharth;
Vol. 556 , No. 1 , pp. 38-45
350 views Abstract
2012
Integrated rapid resolution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric approach for screening and identification of metabolites of the potential anticancer agent 3,6,7-trimethoxyphenanthroindolizidine in rat urine.
Tian, Yaping;He, Jiuming;Zhang, Ruiping;Lv, Haining;Ma, Shuanggang;Chen, Yanhua;Yu, Shishan;Chen, Xiaoguang;Wu, Yan;He, Wenyi;Abliz, Zeper;
Vol. 731 , pp. 60-7
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multi-functional electrochemiluminescence aptasensor based on resonance energy transfer between Au nanoparticles and lanthanum ion-doped cadmium sulfide quantum dots.
Wang, Cun;Chen, Min;Wu, Jingling;Mo, Fangjing;Fu, Yingzi;
Vol. 1086 , pp. 66-74
339 views DOI Abstract
2002
Determination of trace silver in superalloys and steels by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
Jingyu H.
Vol. 451 , pp. 329-335
331 views DOI
2005
Simultaneous on-line preconcentration and determination of trace metals in environmental samples by flow injection combined with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using a nanometer-sized alumina packed micro-column
Yin, Jun;Jiang, Zucheng;Chang, Gang;Hu, Bin
Vol. 540 , No. 2 , pp. 333-339
329 views
2002
Determination of trace silver in superalloys and steels by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry,
Hu Jingyu;Liu Zheng;Wang Haizhou,
Vol. 451 , No. 2 , pp. 329 - 335
324 views DOI Abstract
1984
The voltammetric approach in trace metal chemistry of natural waters and atmospheric precipitation
N\urnberg, H W
Vol. 164 , pp. 1-21
305 views
View All 84 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
50
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.