internal medicine journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4437 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

internal medicine journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name intern med j
Abbreviated Name intern med j
ISSN 1445-5994
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14455994
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2011
Introduction to the Australian consensus guidelines for the management of neutropenic fever in adult cancer patients, 2010/2011. Australian Consensus Guidelines 2011 Steering Committee
Lingaratnam S;Slavin MA;Koczwara B;Seymour JF;Szer J;Underhill C;Prince M;Mileshkin L;O'Reilly M;Kirsa SW;Bennett CA;Davis ID;Morrissey O;Thursky KA; ;;
Vol. 41 , No. 1b , pp. -
446 views Abstract
2010
Acute care costs of patients admitted for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: contribution of disease severity, infection and chronic heart failure.
Hutchinson, A;Brand, C;Irving, L;Roberts, C;Thompson, P;Campbell, D;
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. 364-71
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antimicrobial prescription in patients dying from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Taverner, John;Ross, Lauren;Bartlett, Claire;Luthe, Marco;Ong, Jeffrey;Irving, Louis;Smallwood, Natasha;
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 66-73
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diagnosis, management and prevention of Candida auris in hospitals: position statement of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases.
Ong, Chong W;Chen, Sharon C-A;Clark, Julia E;Halliday, Catriona L;Kidd, Sarah E;Marriott, Deborah J;Marshall, Caroline L;Morris, Arthur J;Morrissey, C Orla;Roy, Rita;Slavin, Monica A;Stewardson, Andrew J;Worth, Leon J;Heath, Christopher H;, ;
Vol. 49 , No. 10 , pp. 1229-1243
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ethical aspects of collateral clinical services by non-credentialled personnel in international medical crises.
Schachter, Madeleine;
Vol. 49 , No. 6 , pp. 777-780
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hyponatremia in Heart Failure.
Tee, Su Ling;Sindone, Andrew;Roger, Simon;Atherton, John;Amerena, John;D'Emden, Michael;Erlich, Jonathan;De Pasquale, Carmine;
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical factors leading to a change in management in chronic hepatitis B patients managed in a tertiary setting.
Koh, Yu Han;Ong, Joanne Hui Yi;McCartney, Erin;Morgan, Joanne;Narayana, Sumudu;Tse, Edmund;
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimizing the response to acute clinical deterioration: the role of Observation and Response Charts.
O'Connell, Alice;Flabouris, Arthas;Thompson, Campbell;
289 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impact of a model of care for heart failure in-patients to reduce variation in care - a quality improvement project.
Hopper, Ingrid;Easton, Kellie;Bader, Illona;Campbell, James;Busija, Lucy;Markey, Peter;Bergin, Peter;Kaye, David;
281 views DOI Abstract
1999
aktivitas enzim lipase alkali dari bakteri dalam surfaktan
;V. Sri Pertiwi Rumiyati; Retno Indrati
Vol. 14 , No. 26 , pp. 84-94
226 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.