urolithiasis | Journament

Journal Ranking

#383 / 33,798
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 16 hours ago

urolithiasis

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim
Short Name urolithiasis
Abbreviated Name urolithiasis
ISSN 2194-7236
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (45 total)

2017
economic burden of malaria on rural households in gwanda district, zimbabwe
;Resign Gunda;Shepherd Shamu;Moses J. Chimbari;Samson Mukaratirwa
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
654 views DOI Abstract
2014
patient satisfaction at accredited antiretroviral treatment sites in the gert sibande district
;Selente Bezuidenhout;Damilola A. Ogunsanwo;Elvera A. Helberg
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
465 views DOI Abstract
2013
predictors of institutional delivery in sodo town, southern ethiopia
;Feleke Hailemichael;Mirkuzie Woldie;Fikru Tafese
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e9
455 views DOI Abstract
2018
decolonising the mindsets, attitudes and practices of the allopathic and indigenous health practitioners in postcolonial society: an exploratory approach in the management of patients
;Simon M. Nemutandani;Stephen J. Hendricks;Mavis F. Mulaudzi
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
389 views DOI Abstract
2013
a pilot study to test psychophonetics methodology for self-care and empathy in compassion fatigue, burnout and secondary traumatic stress
;Katherine J. Train;Nadine Butler
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
375 views DOI Abstract
2012
knowledge, attitude and practice study of hiv in female adolescents presenting for contraceptive services in a rural health district in the north-east of namibia
;Alexis Ntumba;Vera Scott;Ehimario Igumbor
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e7
366 views DOI Abstract
2016
the effectiveness of the south african triage toll use in mahalapye district hospital – emergency department, botswana
;Stephane T. Tshitenge;Gboyega A. Ogunbanjo;Deogratias O. Mbuka
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e5
346 views DOI Abstract
2016
a review of hypoglycaemia in a south african family practice setting
;Devan K. Pillay;Andrew J. Ross;Laura Campbell
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
330 views DOI Abstract
2017
the noncommunicable disease outcomes of primary healthcare screening in two rural subdistricts of the eastern cape province, south africa
;Paul Rheeder;Angela A. Morris-Paxton;Rose-Marie G. Ewing;Dillon Woods
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e7
323 views DOI Abstract
2017
association between depression in carers and malnutrition in children aged 6 months to 5 years
;Keneilwe Motlhatlhedi;Vincent Setlhare;Adewale Ganiyu;Jacqueline Firth
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
323 views DOI Abstract
View All 45 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.