Implementation science : IS | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6642 / 33,980
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

Implementation science : IS

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name Implement Sci
Abbreviated Name implement sci
ISSN 1748-5908
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13012
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2019
Exploring the effect of implementation and context on a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial of a vital sign triage device in routine maternity care in low-resource settings.
Vousden, Nicola;Lawley, Elodie;Seed, Paul T;Gidiri, Muchabayiwa Francis;Charantimath, Umesh;Makonyola, Grace;Brown, Adrian;Yadeta, Lomi;Best, Rebecca;Chinkoyo, Sebastian;Vwalika, Bellington;Nakimuli, Annettee;Ditai, James;Greene, Grace;Chappell, Lucy C;Sandall, Jane;Shennan, Andrew H;, ;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 38
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effect of a clinical decision support system on prompting an intervention for risky alcohol use in a primary care smoking cessation program: a cluster randomized trial.
Minian, Nadia;Baliunas, Dolly;Noormohamed, Aliya;Zawertailo, Laurie;Giesbrecht, Norman;Hendershot, Christian S;Le Foll, Bernard;Rehm, Jürgen;Samokhvalov, Andriy V;Selby, Peter L;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 85
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of the outer setting in implementation: associations between state demographic, fiscal, and policy factors and use of evidence-based treatments in mental healthcare.
Bruns, Eric J;Parker, Elizabeth M;Hensley, Spencer;Pullmann, Michael D;Benjamin, Philip H;Lyon, Aaron R;Hoagwood, Kimberly E;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 96
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
How the study of networks informs knowledge translation and implementation: a scoping review.
Glegg, Stephanie M N;Jenkins, Emily;Kothari, Anita;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 34
405 views DOI Abstract
2018
What drives adoption of a computerised, multifaceted quality improvement intervention for cardiovascular disease management in primary healthcare settings? A mixed methods analysis using normalisation process theory.
Patel, Bindu;Usherwood, Tim;Harris, Mark;Patel, Anushka;Panaretto, Kathryn;Zwar, Nicholas;Peiris, David;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 140
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Scaling-up the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in Mozambique (SAIA-SCALE): a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.
Sherr, Kenneth;Ásbjörnsdóttir, Kristjana;Crocker, Jonny;Coutinho, Joana;de Fatima Cuembelo, Maria;Tavede, Esperança;Manaca, Nélia;Ronen, Keshet;Murgorgo, Felipe;Barnabas, Ruanne;John-Stewart, Grace;Holte, Sarah;Weiner, Bryan J;Pfeiffer, James;Gimbel, Sarah;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 41
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Designing high-quality implementation research: development, application, feasibility and preliminary evaluation of the implementation science research development (ImpRes) tool and guide.
Hull, Louise;Goulding, Lucy;Khadjesari, Zarnie;Davis, Rachel;Healey, Andy;Bakolis, Ioannis;Sevdalis, Nick;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 80
333 views DOI Abstract
2013
Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan
Armstrong R;Waters E;Dobbins M;Anderson L;Moore L;Petticrew M;Clark R;Pettman TL;Burns C;Moodie M;Conning R;Swinburn B;;
Vol. 8 , pp. -
320 views Abstract
2020
The sustainability of public health interventions in schools: a systematic review.
Herlitz, Lauren;MacIntyre, Helen;Osborn, Tom;Bonell, Chris;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 4
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of removal and restriction of me-too medicines in a hospital drug formulary on in- and outpatient drug prescriptions: interrupted time series design with comparison group
Vázquez-Mourelle, R.
Vol. 14 , pp. 75
294 views DOI
View All 25 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.