Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review
Clicks: 223
ID: 272078
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
4.5
/100
15 views
15 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Systematic review authors can consider our results when publishing their systematic reviews. These strategies should be rigorously evaluated to determine impact on use of reviews in decision-making.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (27 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
ac2016implementationbarriers
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Tricco AC;Cardoso R;Thomas SM;Motiwala S;Sullivan S;Kealey MR;Hemmelgarn B;Ouimet M;Hillmer MP;Perrier L;Shepperd S;Straus SE;; |
| Journal | Implementation science : IS |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
systematic review
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
review
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
research support
non-u.s. gov't
attitude of health personnel
decision making*
delivery of health care / organization & administration*
policy making*
evidence-based medicine / standards*
systematic reviews as topic*
pmid:26753923
pmc4709874
doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0370-1
andrea c tricco
roberta cardoso
sharon e straus
administrative personnel / psychology*
health facility administrators / psychology*
health services administration / standards*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.