american heart journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#942 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 hours ago

american heart journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name am heart j
Abbreviated Name am heart j
ISSN 1097-6744
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/american-heart-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
Design and rationale for the Stimulation Of the Left Ventricular Endocardium for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in non-responders and previously untreatable patients (SOLVE-CRT) trial.
Singh, Jagmeet P;Abraham, William T;Auricchio, Angelo;Delnoy, Peter Paul;Gold, Michael;Reddy, Vivek Y;Sanders, Prashanthan;Lindenfeld, JoAnn;Rinaldi, Christopher A;
Vol. 217 , pp. 13-22
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rationale and design of the school-based SI! Program to face obesity and promote health among Spanish adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Fernandez-Jimenez, Rodrigo;Santos-Beneit, Gloria;Tresserra-Rimbau, Anna;Bodega, Patricia;de Miguel, Mercedes;de Cos-Gandoy, Amaya;Rodríguez, Carla;Carral, Vanesa;Orrit, Xavier;Haro, Domènech;Carvajal, Isabel;Ibañez, Borja;Storniolo, Carolina;Domènech, Mónica;Estruch, Ramon;Fernández-Alvira, Juan Miguel;Lamuela-Raventós, Rosa Maria;Fuster, Valentin;
Vol. 215 , pp. 27-40
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of the Cardiovascular Benefits of Resistance, Aerobic, and Combined Exercise (CardioRACE): Rationale, design, and methods.
Brellenthin, Angelique G;Lanningham-Foster, Lorraine M;Kohut, Marian L;Li, Yehua;Church, Timothy S;Blair, Steven N;Lee, Duck-Chul;
Vol. 217 , pp. 101-111
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
Long-term clinical outcomes with use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor early after heart transplantation.
Arashi, Hiroyuki;Sato, Takuma;Kobashigawa, Jon;Luikart, Helen;Kobayashi, Yuhei;Okada, Kozo;Sinha, Seema;Honda, Yasuhiro;Yeung, Alan C;Khush, Kiran;Fearon, William F;
Vol. 222 , pp. 30-37
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
The accuracy of self-reported blood pressure in the Medication adherence Improvement Support App For Engagement-Blood Pressure (MedISAFE-BP) trial: Implications for pragmatic trials.
Haff, Nancy;Lauffenburger, Julie C;Morawski, Kyle;Ghazinouri, Roya;Noor, Nudrat;Kumar, Shefali;Juusola, Jessie;Choudhry, Niteesh K;
Vol. 220 , pp. 68-72
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Major bleeding in patients with peripheral artery disease: Insights from the EUCLID trial.
Ward, Rachael;Huang, Zhen;Rockhold, Frank W;Baumgartner, Iris;Berger, Jeffrey S;Blomster, Juuso I;Fowkes, F Gerry R;Katona, Brian G;Mahaffey, Kenneth W;Norgren, Lars;Vemulapalli, Sreekanth;Povsic, Thomas J;Mehta, Rajendra;Hiatt, William R;Patel, Manesh R;Jones, W Schuyler;
Vol. 220 , pp. 51-58
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Getting to an ImprOved Understanding of Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol and Dyslipidemia Management (GOULD): Methods and baseline data of a registry of high cardiovascular risk patients in the United States: GOULD Registry Methods and Baseline Data
Cannon, C.
Vol. 219 , pp. 70-77
291 views DOI
2019
Targeted hypothermia versus targeted Normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (TTM2): A randomized clinical trial-Rationale and design.
Dankiewicz, Josef;Cronberg, Tobias;Lilja, Gisela;Jakobsen, Janus Christian;Bělohlávek, Jan;Callaway, Clifton;Cariou, Alain;Eastwood, Glenn;Erlinge, David;Hovdenes, Jan;Joannidis, Michael;Kirkegaard, Hans;Kuiper, Michael;Levin, Helena;Morgan, Matt P G;Nichol, Alistair D;Nordberg, Per;Oddo, Mauro;Pelosi, Paolo;Rylander, Christian;Saxena, Manoj;Storm, Christian;Taccone, Fabio;Ullén, Susann;Wise, Matthew P;Young, Paul;Friberg, Hans;Nielsen, Niklas;
Vol. 217 , pp. 23-31
290 views DOI Abstract
2010
Diagnostic and prognostic utility of electrocardiography for left ventricular hypertrophy defined by magnetic resonance imaging in relationship to ethnicity: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)
Aditya Jain,Harikrishna Tandri,Darshan Dalal,Harjit Chahal,Elsayed Z. Soliman,Ronald J. Prineas,Aaron R. Folsom,João A.C. Lima,David A. Bluemke;Aditya Jain;Harikrishna Tandri;Darshan Dalal;Harjit Chahal;Elsayed Z. Soliman;Ronald J. Prineas;Aaron R. Folsom;João A.C. Lima;David A. Bluemke;
Vol. 159 , No. 4 , pp. 652-658
285 views DOI
2020
Admission Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention shock stage stratifies post-discharge mortality risk in cardiac intensive care unit patients
Jentzer, J.
Vol. 219 , pp. 37-46
275 views DOI
View All 13 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.