Targeted hypothermia versus targeted Normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (TTM2): A randomized clinical trial-Rationale and design.
Clicks: 338
ID: 31434
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
69.9
/100
338 views
237 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #9 of 13 articles by views in american heart journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Less than 500 participants have been included in randomized trials comparing hypothermia with regular care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, and many of these trials were small and at a high risk of bias. Consequently, the accrued data on this potentially beneficial intervention resembles that of a drug following small phase II trials. A large confirmatory trial is therefore warranted.The TTM2-trial is an international, multicenter, parallel group, investigator-initiated, randomized, superiority trial in which a target temperature of 33°C after cardiac arrest will be compared with a strategy to maintain normothermia and early treatment of fever (≥37.8°C). Participants will be randomized within 3 hours of return of spontaneous circulation with the intervention period lasting 40 hours in both groups. Sedation will be mandatory for all patients throughout the intervention period. The clinical team involved with direct patient care will not be blinded to allocation group due to the inherent difficulty in blinding the intervention. Prognosticators, outcome-assessors, the steering group, the trial coordinating team, and trial statistician will be blinded. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 180 days after randomization. We estimate a 55% mortality in the control group. To detect an absolute risk reduction of 7.5% with an alpha of 0.05 and 90% power, 1900 participants will be enrolled. The main secondary neurological outcome will be poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6) at 180 days after arrest.The TTM2-trial will compare hypothermia to 33°C with normothermia and early treatment of fever (≥37.8°C) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
| Reference Key |
dankiewicz2019targetedamerican
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Dankiewicz, Josef;Cronberg, Tobias;Lilja, Gisela;Jakobsen, Janus Christian;Bělohlávek, Jan;Callaway, Clifton;Cariou, Alain;Eastwood, Glenn;Erlinge, David;Hovdenes, Jan;Joannidis, Michael;Kirkegaard, Hans;Kuiper, Michael;Levin, Helena;Morgan, Matt P G;Nichol, Alistair D;Nordberg, Per;Oddo, Mauro;Pelosi, Paolo;Rylander, Christian;Saxena, Manoj;Storm, Christian;Taccone, Fabio;Ullén, Susann;Wise, Matthew P;Young, Paul;Friberg, Hans;Nielsen, Niklas; |
| Journal | american heart journal |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0002-8703(19)30157-7
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.