Indexed in Journament

Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran

ISSN 1016-1430· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,561 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
29 Articles
Scores higher than 87.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Med J Islam Repub Iran
Abbreviated Name med j islam repub iran
ISSN 1016-1430

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 34.9
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 79.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 34.9 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.4
Content Distribution 79.0 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

Health care expenditure in the Islamic Republic of Iran versus other high spending countries.
Vol. 31 , pp. 71
480 views DOI Abstract
2017
Leadership challenges in health care organizations: The case of Iranian hospitals.
Vol. 31 , pp. 96
460 views DOI Abstract
2019
Spatial pattern of well-being in Tehran: The north-south gap.
Vol. 33 , pp. 112
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effect of phonological awareness on rapid automatized naming.
Vol. 33 , pp. 32
431 views DOI Abstract
Incorporating E-learning in teaching English language to medical students: exploring its potential contributions.
Vol. 30 , pp. 462
414 views Abstract
2019
Effect of cochlear implantation on language development and assessment of the quality of studies in this field: A systematic review.
Vol. 33 , pp. 107
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Compatibility of the frozen section method in histopathological specimens for female pelvic masses with results for pathology and tumor markers.
Vol. 33 , pp. 42
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
32-Year Scientometric analysis of the Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Vol. 34 , pp. 1
395 views DOI Abstract
2018
A comparison of the earnings of specialist physicians and nurses before and after implementing the Iran's New Tariffs Book.
Vol. 32 , pp. 37
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
32-Year Scientometric analysis of the Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Vol. 34 , pp. 1
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of the health promotion standards in governmental and non-governmental hospitals in East-Azerbaijan.
Vol. 33 , pp. 113
271 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inequality in distribution of burn facilities in Iran.
Vol. 33 , pp. 117
268 views DOI Abstract
2019
Finding the reasons of decrease in the rate of population growth in Iran using causal layered analysis (CLA) method.
Vol. 33 , pp. 92
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Spatial pattern of well-being in Tehran: The north-south gap.
Vol. 33 , pp. 112
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of cochlear implantation on language development and assessment of the quality of studies in this field: A systematic review.
Vol. 33 , pp. 107
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Satisfaction of supplementary insurance for medicinal services in war survivors in Iran.
Vol. 33 , pp. 66
299 views DOI
2019
The effect of phonological awareness on rapid automatized naming.
Vol. 33 , pp. 32
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sustainable financing of health promotion services in selected countries: Best experience for developing countries.
Vol. 33 , pp. 52
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Universal health coverage in Iran: What kind of knowledge is needed to achieve the goals?
Vol. 33 , pp. 65
265 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,561 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

34.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.