Indexed in Journament

Medical education

ISSN 1365-2923· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #999 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
29 Articles
Scores higher than 96.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Med Educ
Abbreviated Name med educ
ISSN 1365-2923
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652923

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 72.5 25.8
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.2
Content Distribution 65.9 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

2019
Critical thinking, biases and dual processing: The enduring myth of generalisable skills.
Monteiro, Sandra;Sherbino, Jonathan;Sibbald, Matthew;Norman, Geoff;
550 views DOI Abstract
2012
Phenomenological analysis of patient experiences of medical student teaching encounters.
McLachlan, Emma;King, Nigel;Wenger, Etienne;Dornan, Tim;
Vol. 46 , No. 10 , pp. 963-73
503 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality improvement in medical schools: vision meets culture.
Blouin, Danielle;
496 views DOI Abstract
2020
"We have different needs": Specifying support for classroom and clinical sessional faculty.
Snook, Abigail Grover;Schram, Asta Bryndis;Arnadottir, Solveig A;
490 views DOI Abstract
1980
Teaching medical English to foreign-language doctors.
Fox, C H;Meijer, F;
Vol. 14 , No. 5 , pp. 316-9
468 views Abstract
2019
Exploring group boundaries and conflicts: a social identity theory perspective.
Bochatay, Naike;Bajwa, Nadia M;Blondon, Katherine S;Junod Perron, Noëlle;Cullati, Stéphane;Nendaz, Mathieu R;
Vol. 53 , No. 8 , pp. 799-807
464 views DOI Abstract
2005
Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: from cognitivism to 'culturism'.
Swanwick, Tim;
Vol. 39 , No. 8 , pp. 859-65
447 views Abstract
2019
Why health professions education needs functional linguistics: the power of 'stealth words'.
Konopasky, Abigail;Ramani, Divya;Ohmer, Megan;Durning, Steven J;Artino, Anthony R;Battista, Alexis;
Vol. 53 , pp. 1187-1195
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Myths and social structure: The unbearable necessity of mythology in medical education.
Martimianakis, Maria Athina Tina;Tilburt, Jon;Michalec, Barret;Hafferty, Frederic W;
429 views DOI Abstract
2020
Journey Into Uncertainty: Medical Students' Experiences And Perceptions of Failure.
Shepherd, Lisa;Gauld, Ryan;Cristancho, Sayra M;Chahine, Saad;
420 views DOI Abstract
2023
Reflections on microlearning in the social media age
Yeoh, A.
Vol. 57 , pp. 290
82 views DOI
2023
Microlearning for faculty development: Concentrate on what really counts
Teichgräber, U.
Vol. 57 , pp. 771-772
120 views DOI
2020
Beyond 'driving': The relationship between assessment, performance and learning.
Scott, Ian M;
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 54-59
83 views DOI Abstract
2020
Virtual Multiple Mini-Interview during a COVID-19 Pandemic.
Ungtrakul, Teerapat;Lamlertthon, Wisut;Boonchoo, Burapen;Auewarakul, Chirayu;
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
Peer mentoring for medical students during COVID-19 pandemic via a social media platform.
Rastegar Kazerooni, AmirAli;Amini, Mitra;Tabari, Parinaz;Moosavi, Mahsa;
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cognitive appraisals and team performance under stress: A simulation study
Carenzo, L.
, pp. 0-0
217 views DOI
2020
Journey Into Uncertainty: Medical Students' Experiences And Perceptions of Failure.
Shepherd, Lisa;Gauld, Ryan;Cristancho, Sayra M;Chahine, Saad;
420 views DOI Abstract
2020
"We have different needs": Specifying support for classroom and clinical sessional faculty.
Snook, Abigail Grover;Schram, Asta Bryndis;Arnadottir, Solveig A;
490 views DOI Abstract
2020
Landscapes of practice in medical education.
Hodson, Nathan;
184 views DOI Abstract
2019
Trainee-environment interactions that stimulate motivation: A rich pictures study.
van der Goot, Wieke E;Cristancho, Sayra M;de Carvalho Filho, Marco Antonio;Jaarsma, A Debbie C;Helmich, Esther;
396 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #999 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.