Indexed in Journament

Medical education

ISSN 1365-2923· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0/100
Journament Score
#8,200
Journament Rank
29
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Med Educ
Abbreviated Name med educ
ISSN 1365-2923
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652923

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

2019
Critical thinking, biases and dual processing: The enduring myth of generalisable skills.
511 views DOI Abstract
2020
"We have different needs": Specifying support for classroom and clinical sessional faculty.
460 views DOI Abstract
2012
Phenomenological analysis of patient experiences of medical student teaching encounters.
Vol. 46 , No. 10 , pp. 963-73
455 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Exploring group boundaries and conflicts: a social identity theory perspective.
Vol. 53 , No. 8 , pp. 799-807
424 views DOI Abstract
1980
Teaching medical English to foreign-language doctors.
Vol. 14 , No. 5 , pp. 316-9
424 views Abstract
2005
Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: from cognitivism to 'culturism'.
Vol. 39 , No. 8 , pp. 859-65
417 views Abstract
2019
Why health professions education needs functional linguistics: the power of 'stealth words'.
Vol. 53 , pp. 1187-1195
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Myths and social structure: The unbearable necessity of mythology in medical education.
393 views DOI Abstract
2020
Journey Into Uncertainty: Medical Students' Experiences And Perceptions of Failure.
381 views DOI Abstract
2023
Reflections on microlearning in the social media age
Vol. 57 , pp. 290
33 views DOI
2023
Microlearning for faculty development: Concentrate on what really counts
Vol. 57 , pp. 771-772
69 views DOI
2020
Beyond 'driving': The relationship between assessment, performance and learning.
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 54-59
55 views DOI Abstract
2020
Virtual Multiple Mini-Interview during a COVID-19 Pandemic.
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
Peer mentoring for medical students during COVID-19 pandemic via a social media platform.
247 views DOI Abstract
2020
Journey Into Uncertainty: Medical Students' Experiences And Perceptions of Failure.
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
"We have different needs": Specifying support for classroom and clinical sessional faculty.
460 views DOI Abstract
2020
Landscapes of practice in medical education.
152 views DOI Abstract
2019
Trainee-environment interactions that stimulate motivation: A rich pictures study.
355 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.