Indexed in Journament

global ecology and conservation

ISSN 2351-9894· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,802 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 83.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name global ecology and conservation
Abbreviated Name global ecology and conservation
ISSN 2351-9894
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/global-ecology-and-conservation

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.5 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 73.7 26.4
Innovation 31.5 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.5
Content Distribution 78.7 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2020
Bushmeat hunting and trade in Myanmar's central teak forests: Threats to biodiversity and human livelihoods
Smiley, Evans T.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
392 views DOI
2020
BDcleaner: A workflow for cleaning taxonomic and geographic errors in occurrence data archived in biodiversity databases
Jin, J.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
387 views DOI
2020
Applicability of GIS-based spatial interpolation and simulation for estimating the soil organic carbon storage in karst regions
Zhang, Z.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
385 views DOI
2015
A new approach to study of seabird-fishery overlap: Connecting chick feeding with parental foraging and overlap with fishing vessels
Sugishita, Junichi;Torres, Leigh G.;Seddon, Philip J.;
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 632-644
381 views Abstract
2018
Webcams as an untapped opportunity to conduct citizen science: Six years of the American Kestrel Partnership's KestrelCam
Schulwitz, Sarah E.;Spurling, D. Paul;Davis, Tala S.;McClure, Christopher J.W.;
Vol. 15 , pp. -
380 views Abstract
2018
Inferring presence of the western toad (Anaxyrus boreas) species complex using environmental DNA
Franklin, Thomas W.;Dysthe, Joseph C.;Golden, Michael;McKelvey, Kevin S.;Hossack, Blake R.;Carim, Kellie J.;Tait, Cynthia;Young, Michael K.;Schwartz, Michael K.;
Vol. 15 , pp. -
378 views Abstract
2020
Giant Panda National Park, a step towards streamlining protected areas and cohesive conservation management in China
Huang, Q.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
376 views DOI
2020
Protected areas reduce poaching but not overall anthropogenic mortality of North American mammals
Hill, J.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
375 views DOI
2020
Amphibian conservation using assisted reproductive technologies: Cryopreserved sperm affects offspring morphology, but not behavior, in a toad
Poo, S.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
353 views DOI
2019
Tourist-wild boar (Sus scrofa)interactions in urban wildlife management
Ikeda, T.
Vol. 18 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2020
Estimating population status and site occupancy of saltwater crocodiles Crocodylus porosus in the Ayeyarwady delta, Myanmar: Inferences from spatial modeling techniques
Than, K.Z.
Vol. 24 , pp. 0-0
193 views DOI
2020
Giant Panda National Park, a step towards streamlining protected areas and cohesive conservation management in China
Huang, Q.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
376 views DOI
2020
Landscape associations of farmland bird diversity in Germany and Japan
Sasaki, K.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
194 views DOI
2020
Temporal variability of overwintering conditions for a species-at-risk snake: Implications for climate change and habitat management
Markle, C.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
217 views DOI
2020
Does the law of diminishing returns in leaf scaling apply to vines? – Evidence from 12 species of climbing plants
Shi, P.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
224 views DOI
2020
BDcleaner: A workflow for cleaning taxonomic and geographic errors in occurrence data archived in biodiversity databases
Jin, J.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
387 views DOI
2020
Agricultural land use reduces plant biodiversity and carbon storage in tropical West African savanna ecosystems: Implications for sustainability
Balima, L.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
289 views DOI
2020
Spatial tradeoff between biodiversity and nature-based tourism: Considering mobile phone-driven visitation pattern
Kim, Y.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
223 views DOI
2020
Bushmeat hunting and trade in Myanmar's central teak forests: Threats to biodiversity and human livelihoods
Smiley, Evans T.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
392 views DOI
2020
Citizen science and invasive alien species: An analysis of citizen science initiatives using information and communications technology (ICT) to collect invasive alien species observations
Johnson, B.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
273 views DOI
Journament Score
36.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,802 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

73.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

31.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

78.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.