global ecology and conservation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#983 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

global ecology and conservation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name global ecology and conservation
Abbreviated Name global ecology and conservation
ISSN 2351-9894
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/global-ecology-and-conservation
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2020
BDcleaner: A workflow for cleaning taxonomic and geographic errors in occurrence data archived in biodiversity databases
Jin, J.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2020
Bushmeat hunting and trade in Myanmar's central teak forests: Threats to biodiversity and human livelihoods
Smiley, Evans T.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2018
Webcams as an untapped opportunity to conduct citizen science: Six years of the American Kestrel Partnership's KestrelCam
Schulwitz, Sarah E.;Spurling, D. Paul;Davis, Tala S.;McClure, Christopher J.W.;
Vol. 15 , pp. -
334 views Abstract
2020
Applicability of GIS-based spatial interpolation and simulation for estimating the soil organic carbon storage in karst regions
Zhang, Z.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
331 views DOI
2015
A new approach to study of seabird-fishery overlap: Connecting chick feeding with parental foraging and overlap with fishing vessels
Sugishita, Junichi;Torres, Leigh G.;Seddon, Philip J.;
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 632-644
328 views Abstract
2020
Giant Panda National Park, a step towards streamlining protected areas and cohesive conservation management in China
Huang, Q.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
320 views DOI
2018
Inferring presence of the western toad (Anaxyrus boreas) species complex using environmental DNA
Franklin, Thomas W.;Dysthe, Joseph C.;Golden, Michael;McKelvey, Kevin S.;Hossack, Blake R.;Carim, Kellie J.;Tait, Cynthia;Young, Michael K.;Schwartz, Michael K.;
Vol. 15 , pp. -
316 views Abstract
2020
Protected areas reduce poaching but not overall anthropogenic mortality of North American mammals
Hill, J.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
311 views DOI
2020
Amphibian conservation using assisted reproductive technologies: Cryopreserved sperm affects offspring morphology, but not behavior, in a toad
Poo, S.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
297 views DOI
2019
Tourist-wild boar (Sus scrofa)interactions in urban wildlife management
Ikeda, T.
Vol. 18 , pp. 0-0
288 views DOI
View All 30 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.