internet research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#415 / 33,900
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

internet research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci soc
Short Name internet research
Abbreviated Name internet research
ISSN 1066-2243
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (64 total)

2019
Upward social comparison and depression in social network settings: The roles of envy and self-efficacy
Li Y.
Vol. 29 , pp. 46-59
405 views DOI
2017
Effect of nature of the game on ad-persuasion in online gaming context: Moderating roles of game-product congruence and consumer’s need for cognition
Vashisht, D.
Vol. 27 , pp. 52-73
250 views DOI
2019
The dual roles of web personalization on consumer decision quality in online shopping: The perspective of information load
Huang, J.
Vol. 29 , pp. 1280-1300
232 views DOI
2019
How functional and emotional ads drive smartwatch adoption: The moderating role of consumer innovativeness and extraversion
Krey, N.
Vol. 29 , pp. 578-602
210 views DOI
2011
asur tİcaret kolonİlerİ ÇaĞinda asurlu tÜccarlar İle anadolu halki arasinda İlİŞkİler / contacts between assyrian merchants and anatolian natives in the assyrian trade colony period
;Hatice Gül KÜÇÜKBEZCİ
, No. 26 , pp. 25-58
210 views Abstract
2019
Increasing rates of impulsive online shopping on tourism websites
Chen, C.
Vol. 29 , pp. 900-920
209 views DOI
2019
Effects of socialization interactions on customer engagement in online travel communities
Luo, N.
Vol. 29 , pp. 1509-1525
192 views DOI
2017
Examining the effects of network externalities, density, and closure on in-game currency price in online games
Xu, X.
Vol. 27 , pp. 924-941
179 views DOI
2016
bİr edebİyat dersİnde bİr Şİİrİ Çevİrİlerİyle okumak: walt whitman’in o captain! my captain! baŞlikli Şİİrİ İle fransizca ve tÜrkÇe Çevİrİlerİ / reading a poem with its translations in the literature class: walt whitman’s o captain! my captain! and its f
;Didem TUNA
, No. 36 , pp. 59-78
176 views Abstract
2017
on the edge of artificial life and existentialism: legitimizing ‘robo-culture’ through anarchy, order and manufacture
;Timuçin Buğra EDMAN
, No. 37 , pp. 377-386
167 views DOI Abstract
View All 64 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.