australian and new zealand journal of public health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1089 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 minggu yang lalu

australian and new zealand journal of public health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Pengindeksan
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci soc
Nama Singkat aust n z j public health
Nama Singkatan aust n z j public health
ISSN 1753-6405
Tujuan dan Ruang Lingkup
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/australian-and-new-zealand-journal-of-public-health
Petunjuk untuk Penulis

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2013
Policy scorecard for gender mainstreaming: gender equity in health policy
Keleher, Helen;
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 111-117
435 views Abstract
2020
Self-reported injury in Australian young adults: demographic and lifestyle predictors.
Stokes, Mark A;Hemphill, Sheryl;McGillivray, Jane;Evans-Whipp, Tracy;Satyen, Lata;Toumbourou, John W;
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
Regional primary health care organisations and migrant and refugee health: the importance of prioritisation, funding, collaboration and engagement.
Ziersch, Anna;Freeman, Toby;Javanparast, Sara;Mackean, Tamara;Baum, Fran;
400 views DOI Abstract
2013
Beyond the paper trail: using technology to reduce escalating harms from opioid prescribing in Australia
Nicholas, Roger;Roche, Ann;Dobbin, Malcolm;Lee, Nicole;
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 139-147
379 views Abstract
2019
Relative risk of suicide following exposure to recent stressors, Victoria, Australia
Clapperton, Angela;Newstead, Stuart;Bugeja, Lyndal;Pirkis, Jane;
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 254-260
373 views DOI Abstract
2014
Improving the evidence-base for access to primary health care in Canterbury: a panel study
Philip J. Schluter,Paul Bridgford,Lynley Cook,Greg Hamilton;Philip J. Schluter;Paul Bridgford;Lynley Cook;Greg Hamilton;
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 171-176
364 views DOI Abstract
2015
Civil disobedience, the energy-climate nexus and Australian coal exports.
Butler, Colin D;Sainsbury, Peter;Armstrong, Fiona;
Vol. 39 , No. 1 , pp. 93
349 views DOI
2020
Factors influencing the willingness of community service organisation staff to provide smoking cessation support: a qualitative study.
Parnell, Ashleigh;Box, Emily;Biagioni, Nicole;Bonevski, Billie;Anwar-McHenry, Julia;Slevin, Terry;Pettigrew, Simone;
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public health and natural hazards: new policies and preparedness initiatives developed from an Australian bushfire case study.
Westcott, Rachel;Ronan, Kevin;Bambrick, Hilary;Taylor, Melanie;
Vol. 43 , No. 4 , pp. 395-400
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Parental opinions about the responsibility for assessing children's weight status - a survey of Rockhampton parents.
Davidson, Kamila;Vidgen, Helen;Denney-Wilson, Elizabeth;
334 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.