Indexed in Journament

australian and new zealand journal of public health

ISSN 1753-6405· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,149 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 55.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name aust n z j public health
Abbreviated Name aust n z j public health
ISSN 1753-6405
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/australian-and-new-zealand-journal-of-public-health

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.9 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.9 7.8
Content Distribution 82.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2013
Policy scorecard for gender mainstreaming: gender equity in health policy
Keleher, Helen;
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 111-117
464 views Abstract
2020
Regional primary health care organisations and migrant and refugee health: the importance of prioritisation, funding, collaboration and engagement.
Ziersch, Anna;Freeman, Toby;Javanparast, Sara;Mackean, Tamara;Baum, Fran;
441 views DOI Abstract
2020
Self-reported injury in Australian young adults: demographic and lifestyle predictors.
Stokes, Mark A;Hemphill, Sheryl;McGillivray, Jane;Evans-Whipp, Tracy;Satyen, Lata;Toumbourou, John W;
438 views DOI Abstract
2013
Beyond the paper trail: using technology to reduce escalating harms from opioid prescribing in Australia
Nicholas, Roger;Roche, Ann;Dobbin, Malcolm;Lee, Nicole;
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 139-147
413 views Abstract
2020
Factors influencing the willingness of community service organisation staff to provide smoking cessation support: a qualitative study.
Parnell, Ashleigh;Box, Emily;Biagioni, Nicole;Bonevski, Billie;Anwar-McHenry, Julia;Slevin, Terry;Pettigrew, Simone;
408 views DOI Abstract
2014
Improving the evidence-base for access to primary health care in Canterbury: a panel study
Philip J. Schluter,Paul Bridgford,Lynley Cook,Greg Hamilton;Philip J. Schluter;Paul Bridgford;Lynley Cook;Greg Hamilton;
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 171-176
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relative risk of suicide following exposure to recent stressors, Victoria, Australia
Clapperton, Angela;Newstead, Stuart;Bugeja, Lyndal;Pirkis, Jane;
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 254-260
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public health and natural hazards: new policies and preparedness initiatives developed from an Australian bushfire case study.
Westcott, Rachel;Ronan, Kevin;Bambrick, Hilary;Taylor, Melanie;
Vol. 43 , No. 4 , pp. 395-400
394 views DOI Abstract
2015
Civil disobedience, the energy-climate nexus and Australian coal exports.
Butler, Colin D;Sainsbury, Peter;Armstrong, Fiona;
Vol. 39 , No. 1 , pp. 93
380 views DOI
2019
Parental opinions about the responsibility for assessing children's weight status - a survey of Rockhampton parents.
Davidson, Kamila;Vidgen, Helen;Denney-Wilson, Elizabeth;
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
Harmful drinking is associated with mental health conditions and other risk behaviours in Australian young people.
Lima, Fernando;Sims, Scott;O'Donnell, Melissa;
256 views DOI Abstract
2020
Self-reported injury in Australian young adults: demographic and lifestyle predictors.
Stokes, Mark A;Hemphill, Sheryl;McGillivray, Jane;Evans-Whipp, Tracy;Satyen, Lata;Toumbourou, John W;
438 views DOI Abstract
2020
Factors influencing the willingness of community service organisation staff to provide smoking cessation support: a qualitative study.
Parnell, Ashleigh;Box, Emily;Biagioni, Nicole;Bonevski, Billie;Anwar-McHenry, Julia;Slevin, Terry;Pettigrew, Simone;
408 views DOI Abstract
2020
Alcohol and fast food sponsorship in sporting clubs with junior teams participating in the 'Good Sports' program: a cross-sectional study.
Gonzalez, Sharleen;Kingsland, Melanie;Hall, Alix;Clinton-McHarg, Tara;Lecathelinais, Christophe;Zukowski, Nadya;Milner, Sharin;Sherker, Shauna;Rogers, Ben;Doran, Christopher;Brooke, Daisy;Wiggers, John;Wolfenden, Luke;
297 views DOI Abstract
2020
Regional primary health care organisations and migrant and refugee health: the importance of prioritisation, funding, collaboration and engagement.
Ziersch, Anna;Freeman, Toby;Javanparast, Sara;Mackean, Tamara;Baum, Fran;
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public health and natural hazards: new policies and preparedness initiatives developed from an Australian bushfire case study.
Westcott, Rachel;Ronan, Kevin;Bambrick, Hilary;Taylor, Melanie;
Vol. 43 , No. 4 , pp. 395-400
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relative risk of suicide following exposure to recent stressors, Victoria, Australia
Clapperton, Angela;Newstead, Stuart;Bugeja, Lyndal;Pirkis, Jane;
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 254-260
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Parental opinions about the responsibility for assessing children's weight status - a survey of Rockhampton parents.
Davidson, Kamila;Vidgen, Helen;Denney-Wilson, Elizabeth;
362 views DOI Abstract
2018
Impact of the Make Healthy Normal mass media campaign (Phase 1) on knowledge, attitudes and behaviours: a cohort study
Kite, James;Gale, Joanne;Grunseit, Anne;Bellew, William;Li, Vincy;Lloyd, Beverley;Maxwell, Michelle;Vineburg, John;Bauman, Adrian;
Vol. 42 , No. 3 , pp. 269-276
262 views Abstract
2018
Vulnerable, single and living in poverty: Women’s challenges to accessing food in the Australian Capital Territory
Lawlis, T.
Vol. 42 , pp. 541-546
243 views DOI
Journament Score
34.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,149 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

25.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

82.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.