Improving the evidence-base for access to primary health care in Canterbury: a panel study
Clicks: 425
ID: 269206
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
425 views
70 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #6 of 17 articles by views in australian and new zealand journal of public health
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objective: Despite many reforms and initiatives, inequities in access to primary health care remain. However, the concept of ‘access’ and its measurement is complex. This paper aims to provide estimates of general practice visit frequencies for ‘attenders’ (those who seek consultation) and the proportion of ‘non‐attenders’ (those who never seek consultation) of primary health care services.
| Reference Key |
hamilton2014australianimproving
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip J. Schluter,Paul Bridgford,Lynley Cook,Greg Hamilton;Philip J. Schluter;Paul Bridgford;Lynley Cook;Greg Hamilton; |
| Journal | australian and new zealand journal of public health |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.1111/1753-6405.12155
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.