algorithmica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#267 / 33,798
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 hours ago

algorithmica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name algorithmica
Abbreviated Name algorithmica
ISSN 0178-4617
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2015
predicting factors of drop out counseling process in university psychological counseling and guidance center
;Omer OZER;Ahmet ALTINOK
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 18-25
590 views Abstract
2014
effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy on pain of patients with low back pain
;Suhda Banth;Maryam Didehdar ardebil
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 46-52
277 views Abstract
2016
in lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals: attachment, self-compassion and internalized homophobia: a theoretical study
;Zeynep Set;Ahmet Altinok
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 135-144
266 views DOI Abstract
2015
the use of the cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of migraine and tension type headaches
;Yasemin Akkoca;Þehnaz Yýldýrým;Levent Ertuðrul Ýnan
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 10-17
235 views DOI Abstract
2017
fear avoidance beliefs and quality of life quality after lumbar disc surgery
;Dogan Gucluhan Guclu;Omer Senormanci;Oya Gonullu;Musa Cirak;Guliz Senomanci;Furuzan Kokturk
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
234 views DOI Abstract
2019
Expand the Shares Together: Envy-Free Mechanisms with a Small Number of Cuts
Seddighin M.
Vol. 81 , pp. 1728-1755
232 views DOI
2013
could selectively skipping of the repetitive thinking questionnaire among a series of self-report scales in a study be a coping strategy?
;İ. Volkan GÜLÜM;İhsan DAĞ
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 89-97
223 views Abstract
2016
aripirazole and cognitive behavioral therapy in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: case study
;Sevim Berrin INCI;Ulku AKYOL ARDIC;Melis IPCI;Eyup Sabri ERCAN
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 44-49
222 views DOI Abstract
2012
insight, cognitive insight and sociodemographic features in obsessive compulsive disorder presenting with reactive and autogeneus features
;Katre ÇAMLI;M. Hakan TÜRKÇAPAR;A. Emre SARGIN
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 28-35
214 views Abstract
2017
comparision of parent reported sleeping habits and sleep problems between attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls
;Yusuf Ozturk;Gonca Ozyurt;Aynur Pekcanlar Akay
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 108-114
204 views DOI Abstract
View All 20 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.