Indexed in Journament

Applied ergonomics

ISSN 1872-9126· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.2/100
Journament Score
#3,260
Journament Rank
56
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Appl Ergon
Abbreviated Name appl ergon
ISSN 1872-9126
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-ergonomics

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (56)

2020
Considering sex and gender in ergonomics: Exploring the hows and whys.
Laberge, Marie;Caroly, Sandrine;Riel, Jessica;Messing, Karen;
Vol. 85 , pp. 103039
392 views DOI Abstract
2020
Does sEMG normalization change results on sex differences in the activation of the shoulder girdle muscles during a simulated work task?
Cid, Marina Machado;Januario, Leticia Bergamin;Moreira, Roberta de Fátima Carreira;Côté, Julie N;Madeleine, Pascal;Oliveira, Ana Beatriz;
Vol. 85 , pp. 103044
388 views DOI Abstract
2015
Pre-flight safety briefings, mood and information retention.
Tehrani, Morteza;Molesworth, Brett R C;
Vol. 51 , pp. 377-82
384 views DOI Abstract
2016
Self-driving carsickness.
Diels, Cyriel;Bos, Jelte E;
Vol. 53 Pt B , pp. 374-82
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing community health workers' conditions for delivering care to patients in low-income communities.
Jatobá, Alessandro;Bellas, Hugo Cesar;Bulhões, Bárbara;Koster, Isabella;Arcuri, Rodrigo;de Carvalho, Paulo Victor R;
Vol. 82 , pp. 102944
369 views DOI Abstract
2002
A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products.
Kwahk, Jiyoung;Han, Sung H;
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 419-31
369 views Abstract
2020
Open plan office space? If you're going to do it, do it right: A fourteen-month longitudinal case study
Morrison, R.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
366 views DOI
2020
Comparison of in-sight and handheld navigation devices toward supporting industry 4.0 supply chains: First and last mile deliveries at the human level
van, Lopik K.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
362 views DOI
2020
Paramedic equipment bags: How their position during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affect paramedic ergonomics and performance
Harari, Y.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
359 views DOI
2019
Exploring multiple working arrangements in Norwegian engineering, procurement, and construction industry from a middle manager and supervisor perspective: A sociotechnical system perspective.
Høyland, Sindre Aske;Holte, Kari Anne;Gressgård, Leif Jarle;Hansen, Kåre;Solberg, Astrid;
Vol. 76 , pp. 73-81
352 views DOI Abstract
2021
Development and validation of the discomfort of cloth Masks-12 (DCM-12) scale.
Mumma, Joel M;Jordan, Ellen;Ayeni, Oluwateniola;Kaufman, Noah;Wheatley, Marisa J;Grindle, Amanda;Morgan, Jill;
Vol. 98 , pp. 103616
135 views DOI Abstract
2020
temperamental development among preterm born children. an rct follow-up study
;Inger Pauline Landsem;Bjørn Helge Handegård;Stein Erik Ulvund
Vol. 7 , No. 36 , pp. 36-
245 views DOI Abstract
2020
Decision-making during nonroutine outbreak management: Toward an exploration of experts' creative decisions.
Pellegrin, Liliane;Chassery, Leila;Chaudet, Hervé;Texier, Gaëtan;Bonnardel, Nathalie;
Vol. 90 , pp. 103232
189 views DOI Abstract
2020
Driving automation state-of-mind: Using training to instigate rapid mental model development
Krampell, M.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
135 views DOI
2020
Paramedic equipment bags: How their position during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affect paramedic ergonomics and performance
Harari, Y.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
359 views DOI
2020
Corrigendum to “Are ergonomically designed road signs more easily learned?” (Applied Ergonomics (2019) 78 (137–147), (S0003687019300523), (10.1016/j.apergo.2019.02.009))
Ben-Bassat, T.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
172 views DOI
2020
Non-vehicle commuting in Italy: need for ergonomic action for women's lower limbs?
Salerno, S.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
175 views DOI
2020
Syrian refugee child workers: Gender differences in ergonomic exposures and musculoskeletal health
Habib, R.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
246 views DOI
2020
Corrigendum to “A method for effect modifier assessment (EMA) in ergonomic intervention research” (Applied Ergonomics (2018) 72 (113–120), (S0003687018301303), (10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.007))
Edwards, K.
Vol. 84 , pp. 0-0
270 views DOI
2020
Causation, levels of analysis and explanation in systems ergonomics – A Closer Look at the UK NHS Morecambe Bay investigation
Waterson, P.
Vol. 84 , pp. 0-0
181 views DOI
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.