Applied ergonomics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1092 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

Applied ergonomics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name Appl Ergon
Abbreviated Name appl ergon
ISSN 1872-9126
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-ergonomics
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (56 total)

2020
Considering sex and gender in ergonomics: Exploring the hows and whys.
Laberge, Marie;Caroly, Sandrine;Riel, Jessica;Messing, Karen;
Vol. 85 , pp. 103039
373 views DOI Abstract
2020
Does sEMG normalization change results on sex differences in the activation of the shoulder girdle muscles during a simulated work task?
Cid, Marina Machado;Januario, Leticia Bergamin;Moreira, Roberta de Fátima Carreira;Côté, Julie N;Madeleine, Pascal;Oliveira, Ana Beatriz;
Vol. 85 , pp. 103044
361 views DOI Abstract
2015
Pre-flight safety briefings, mood and information retention.
Tehrani, Morteza;Molesworth, Brett R C;
Vol. 51 , pp. 377-82
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing community health workers' conditions for delivering care to patients in low-income communities.
Jatobá, Alessandro;Bellas, Hugo Cesar;Bulhões, Bárbara;Koster, Isabella;Arcuri, Rodrigo;de Carvalho, Paulo Victor R;
Vol. 82 , pp. 102944
352 views DOI Abstract
2002
A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products.
Kwahk, Jiyoung;Han, Sung H;
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 419-31
348 views Abstract
2020
Open plan office space? If you're going to do it, do it right: A fourteen-month longitudinal case study
Morrison, R.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
347 views DOI
2020
Comparison of in-sight and handheld navigation devices toward supporting industry 4.0 supply chains: First and last mile deliveries at the human level
van, Lopik K.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
346 views DOI
2016
Self-driving carsickness.
Diels, Cyriel;Bos, Jelte E;
Vol. 53 Pt B , pp. 374-82
340 views DOI Abstract
2020
Paramedic equipment bags: How their position during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affect paramedic ergonomics and performance
Harari, Y.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
338 views DOI
2019
Exploring multiple working arrangements in Norwegian engineering, procurement, and construction industry from a middle manager and supervisor perspective: A sociotechnical system perspective.
Høyland, Sindre Aske;Holte, Kari Anne;Gressgård, Leif Jarle;Hansen, Kåre;Solberg, Astrid;
Vol. 76 , pp. 73-81
321 views DOI Abstract
View All 56 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.