Indexed in Journament

Applied ergonomics

ISSN 1872-9126· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,118 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
56 Articles
Scores higher than 41.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Appl Ergon
Abbreviated Name appl ergon
ISSN 1872-9126
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-ergonomics

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 11.1 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 8.6 7.8
Content Distribution 75.2 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (56)

2020
Considering sex and gender in ergonomics: Exploring the hows and whys.
Laberge, Marie;Caroly, Sandrine;Riel, Jessica;Messing, Karen;
Vol. 85 , pp. 103039
424 views DOI Abstract
2015
Pre-flight safety briefings, mood and information retention.
Tehrani, Morteza;Molesworth, Brett R C;
Vol. 51 , pp. 377-82
424 views DOI Abstract
2002
A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products.
Kwahk, Jiyoung;Han, Sung H;
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 419-31
419 views Abstract
2020
Does sEMG normalization change results on sex differences in the activation of the shoulder girdle muscles during a simulated work task?
Cid, Marina Machado;Januario, Leticia Bergamin;Moreira, Roberta de Fátima Carreira;Côté, Julie N;Madeleine, Pascal;Oliveira, Ana Beatriz;
Vol. 85 , pp. 103044
407 views DOI Abstract
2016
Self-driving carsickness.
Diels, Cyriel;Bos, Jelte E;
Vol. 53 Pt B , pp. 374-82
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing community health workers' conditions for delivering care to patients in low-income communities.
Jatobá, Alessandro;Bellas, Hugo Cesar;Bulhões, Bárbara;Koster, Isabella;Arcuri, Rodrigo;de Carvalho, Paulo Victor R;
Vol. 82 , pp. 102944
391 views DOI Abstract
2020
Open plan office space? If you're going to do it, do it right: A fourteen-month longitudinal case study
Morrison, R.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
381 views DOI
2020
Comparison of in-sight and handheld navigation devices toward supporting industry 4.0 supply chains: First and last mile deliveries at the human level
van, Lopik K.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
379 views DOI
2020
Paramedic equipment bags: How their position during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affect paramedic ergonomics and performance
Harari, Y.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
376 views DOI
2019
Exploring multiple working arrangements in Norwegian engineering, procurement, and construction industry from a middle manager and supervisor perspective: A sociotechnical system perspective.
Høyland, Sindre Aske;Holte, Kari Anne;Gressgård, Leif Jarle;Hansen, Kåre;Solberg, Astrid;
Vol. 76 , pp. 73-81
375 views DOI Abstract
2021
Development and validation of the discomfort of cloth Masks-12 (DCM-12) scale.
Mumma, Joel M;Jordan, Ellen;Ayeni, Oluwateniola;Kaufman, Noah;Wheatley, Marisa J;Grindle, Amanda;Morgan, Jill;
Vol. 98 , pp. 103616
161 views DOI Abstract
2020
temperamental development among preterm born children. an rct follow-up study
;Inger Pauline Landsem;Bjørn Helge Handegård;Stein Erik Ulvund
Vol. 7 , No. 36 , pp. 36-
266 views DOI Abstract
2020
Decision-making during nonroutine outbreak management: Toward an exploration of experts' creative decisions.
Pellegrin, Liliane;Chassery, Leila;Chaudet, Hervé;Texier, Gaëtan;Bonnardel, Nathalie;
Vol. 90 , pp. 103232
219 views DOI Abstract
2020
Driving automation state-of-mind: Using training to instigate rapid mental model development
Krampell, M.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
161 views DOI
2020
Paramedic equipment bags: How their position during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affect paramedic ergonomics and performance
Harari, Y.
Vol. 82 , pp. 0-0
376 views DOI
2020
Corrigendum to “Are ergonomically designed road signs more easily learned?” (Applied Ergonomics (2019) 78 (137–147), (S0003687019300523), (10.1016/j.apergo.2019.02.009))
Ben-Bassat, T.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
193 views DOI
2020
Non-vehicle commuting in Italy: need for ergonomic action for women's lower limbs?
Salerno, S.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
196 views DOI
2020
Syrian refugee child workers: Gender differences in ergonomic exposures and musculoskeletal health
Habib, R.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
267 views DOI
2020
Corrigendum to “A method for effect modifier assessment (EMA) in ergonomic intervention research” (Applied Ergonomics (2018) 72 (113–120), (S0003687018301303), (10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.007))
Edwards, K.
Vol. 84 , pp. 0-0
293 views DOI
2020
Causation, levels of analysis and explanation in systems ergonomics – A Closer Look at the UK NHS Morecambe Bay investigation
Waterson, P.
Vol. 84 , pp. 0-0
202 views DOI
Journament Score
31.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,118 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.