Decision-making during nonroutine outbreak management: Toward an exploration of experts' creative decisions.
Clicks: 190
ID: 121936
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
181 views
32 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Decision-making during critical outbreak management may require standard strategies, but also more creative ones. Our goal was to characterize the expert decision processes that take place during critical situations, where rule-based strategies and usual procedures cannot be satisfactorily applied. More specifically, we focused on the strategies experts use to deal with epidemiological problems, depending on the complexity of the situation. To this end, we carried out a simulated outbreak alert, to place two experts in a situation of epidemiological problem management, based on usual practice but also conducive to implementing creative solutions. To analyze the data, we considered not only the relevance of the solutions proposed by the experts, but also the four creativity criteria defined by Torrance (fluency, flexibility, elaboration and originality). Results allowed us to identify similarities but also differences between the solutions proposed by the experts, depending on their level of experience in this area.
| Reference Key |
pellegrin2020decisionmakingapplied
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Pellegrin, Liliane;Chassery, Leila;Chaudet, Hervé;Texier, Gaëtan;Bonnardel, Nathalie; |
| Journal | Applied ergonomics |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
S0003-6870(20)30174-5
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.