bìznes inform | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2889 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

bìznes inform

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name bìznes inform
Abbreviated Name bìznes inform
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2018
The Simulation Model of Management of Competitiveness of the Industrial Complexes of Regions
, Obolentseva Larysa V.;
Vol. 12 , No. 491 , pp. 169-176
457 views Abstract
2017
The Poverty of Population and its Impact on Formation of Food Security
, Pchelianska Halyna O.;
Vol. 8 , No. 475 , pp. 167-172
374 views Abstract
2019
The Conception of Transformation of Marketing Functions on the Basis of Innovative Economy
V., Proskurnina Nadiia;
Vol. 2 , No. 493 , pp. 308-316
349 views Abstract
2019
Tax Revenues to the Budgets of the United Territorial Communities as a Source of Financing for Their Development
, Dub Andrii R.;M., Hrynchyshyn Iryna;
Vol. 6 , No. 497 , pp. 227-233
321 views Abstract
2013
Justification and Selection of Directions of Realisation of Marketing of Company’s Personnel Обоснование и выбор направлений реализации маркетинга персонала предприятия
N., Kryvoruchko Oksana;I., Gladka Olena;
, No. 5 , pp. 338-344
321 views Abstract
2019
Scientific Support and Practice of Reshaping Districts of a Region
V., Beliavceva Victoria;
Vol. 5 , No. 496 , pp. 73-79
309 views Abstract
2013
Problems of Classifying Financial Investments of Enterprises in Ukraine Проблемы осуществления классификации финансовых инвестиций предприятий в Украине
S., Zdrenyk Vasyl;
, No. 10 , pp. 60-65
305 views Abstract
2019
Necessitating the Tax Optimization as a Basic Prerequisite for Unshadowing of Business
, Sheketa Yevheniia Yu.;
Vol. 9 , No. 500 , pp. 79-85
296 views Abstract
2018
Developing the Risk Management System in the Activity of Financial Intelligence Division
M., Vnukova Nataliya;A., Achkasova Svitlana;V., Horianyk Olesia;
Vol. 12 , No. 491 , pp. 329-339
284 views Abstract
2018
Start-up First Term Sheet: Stumbling Blocks to Avoid
, Amalyan Nataly D.;
Vol. 1 , No. 480 , pp. 104-110
251 views Abstract
View All 18 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.