personality & social psychology bulletin | Journament

Journal Ranking

#240 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

personality & social psychology bulletin

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name pers soc psychol bull
Abbreviated Name pers soc psychol bull
ISSN 1552-7433
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2005
The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001.
Cohrs, J Christopher;Moschner, Barbara;Maes, Jürgen;Kielmann, Sven;
Vol. 31 , No. 10 , pp. 1425-34
270 views Abstract
2009
evaluaciÓn de cuatro especies forestales asociadas con cafÉ (coffea arabica l.) y en monocultivo en el litoral ecuatoriano
;Pedro Suatunce Cunuhay;Teofilo Gorki Díaz Coronel;Luz García Cruzatty
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 29-34
268 views DOI Abstract
2019
When and Why Being Ostracized Affects Veracity Judgments.
Eck, Jennifer;Schoel, Christiane;Reinhard, Marc-André;Greifeneder, Rainer;
, pp. 146167219860135
255 views DOI Abstract
2010
plagas y enfermedades en plantaciones de teca (tectona grandis l.f) en la zona de balzar, provincia del guayas
;Tonny Flores Velasteguí;Fernando Cabezas Guerrero;Rommel Crespo Gutiérrez
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 15-22
254 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Status-Seeking Account of Psychological Entitlement.
Lange, Jens;Redford, Liz;Crusius, Jan;
Vol. 45 , No. 7 , pp. 1113-1128
248 views DOI Abstract
2012
Don't tread on me: masculine honor ideology in the U.S. and militant responses to terrorism.
Barnes, Collin D;Brown, Ryan P;Osterman, Lindsey L;
Vol. 38 , No. 8 , pp. 1018-29
234 views DOI Abstract
2006
Defenders of a lost cause: terror management and violent resistance to the disengagement plan.
Hirschberger, Gilad;Ein-Dor, Tsachi;
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. 761-9
232 views Abstract
2014
"Not one of us": predictors and consequences of denying ingroup characteristics to ambiguous targets.
Kteily, Nour;Cotterill, Sarah;Sidanius, Jim;Sheehy-Skeffington, Jennifer;Bergh, Robin;
Vol. 40 , No. 10 , pp. 1231-47
222 views DOI Abstract
2008
alternativas para la propagaciÓn in vitro de plÁtano variedad maqueÑo (musa balbisiana aab)
;Hayron Fabricio Canchignia Martínez;José Pedro Toaquiza Soatunsig;Luís Ramos Gavilanes;Luis Ernesto Sigcha Sigcha;Mercedes Susana Carranza Patiño;Orly Fernando Cevallos Falquez;Silvia Gicela Saucedo Aguiar
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 43-48
210 views DOI Abstract
2010
uso de enzimas en la crÍa y engorde de pollos broilers en Época lluviosa en las localidades de quevedo, salcedo y santo domingo de los colorados
;Ricardo Luna Murillo;Ana Espinoza Coronel;Fiamma Luna Quintana;Guadalupe Murillo Campuzano;Guido Alvarez Perdomo;Héctor Valverde;Mariana Reyes Bermeo;Nancy Iza Taco
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 25-31
208 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.