corporate communications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9052 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated il y a 1 mois

corporate communications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexations
scopus
Nom Abrégé corporate communications
Nom Abrégé corporate communications
ISSN
Objectifs et Portée
URL
Instructions aux Auteurs

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2019
Change communication and the use of anonymous social media at work: Implications for employee engagement
Kim, H.
Vol. 24 , pp. 410-424
227 views DOI
2016
edificiile mănăstirii căpriana în primele două decenii ale secolului al xix-lea / buildings of the capriana monastery in the first two decades of the 19th century
;Sergius Ciocanu
Vol. X , No. 2 , pp. 163-172
214 views Abstract
2015
Перегородчатые эмали из собрания А.В. Звенигородского и исследование Л. Пекарской «jewellery of princely kiev. the kiev hoards in the british museum and the metropolitan museum of art and related material» / cloisonné enamels from the former collection alexander zwenigorodsky and a new book by ljudmila pekarska, jewellery of princely kiev. the kiev hoards in the british museum and the metropolitan museum of art and related material)
;Yuri Pyatnitsky
Vol. IX , No. 2 , pp. 291-314
201 views Abstract
2017
additions and clarifications on the biography of ioan pelivan
;Dinu Poştarencu
Vol. VII , No. 2 , pp. 203-213
192 views Abstract
2014
memoirs – important resource of reconstructing the ordeal of deportations
;Elena Postică
Vol. VIII , No. 2 , pp. 289-298
182 views Abstract
2013
a manuscript about clergymen of the nativity cathedral in chişinău during 1840-1851
;Igor Cereteu
Vol. VII , No. 2 , pp. 167-174
181 views Abstract
2013
stone objects found in the settlements of noua-sabatinovka cultures in the prut-dniester area
;Mariana Sîrbu
Vol. VII , No. 1 , pp. 163-188
179 views Abstract
2013
les etapes d’édification de la fortification de horodca mică
;Octavian Munteanu
Vol. VII , No. 1 , pp. 311-328
169 views Abstract
2016
rezultatele preliminare ale cercetărilor arheologice întreprinse în anul 2016 în aşezarea neoeneolitică de la nicolaevca v / preliminary results of the archaeological investigations in the neolithic and copper age site of nicolaevca v during the 2016 excavation season
;Stanislav Ţerna;Maciej Dębiec;Andreea Vornicu-Ţerna;Mariana Vasilache-Curoşu;Thomas Saile
Vol. X , No. 1 , pp. 117-128
166 views Abstract
2019
When is silence golden? The use of strategic silence in crisis communication
Le, P.
Vol. 24 , pp. 162-178
163 views DOI
View All 15 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.